2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2011.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Bayes predictive densities for high-dimensional normal models

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper addresses the problem of estimating the density of a future outcome from a multivariate normal model. We propose a class of empirical Bayes predictive densities and evaluate their performances under the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We show that these empirical Bayes predictive densities dominate the Bayesian predictive density under the uniform prior and thus are minimax under some general conditions. We also establish the asymptotic optimality of these empirical Bayes predictive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decision theoretic parallels between predictive density estimation under Kullback–Leibler loss and point estimation under quadratic loss have been explored in our Gaussian model by George, Liang and Xu (2006), Ghosh, Mergel and Datta (2008), Komaki (2004), Xu and Zhou (2011) and George, Liang and Xu (2012). For unconstrained parameter spaces normalΘ=0.2emn, fundamental ideas in Gaussian point estimation theory can be extended to yield optimal predictive density estimates [Brown, George and Xu (2008), Fourdrinier et al (2011), Komaki (2001)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision theoretic parallels between predictive density estimation under Kullback–Leibler loss and point estimation under quadratic loss have been explored in our Gaussian model by George, Liang and Xu (2006), Ghosh, Mergel and Datta (2008), Komaki (2004), Xu and Zhou (2011) and George, Liang and Xu (2012). For unconstrained parameter spaces normalΘ=0.2emn, fundamental ideas in Gaussian point estimation theory can be extended to yield optimal predictive density estimates [Brown, George and Xu (2008), Fourdrinier et al (2011), Komaki (2001)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed past X and unobserved future Y are only related through the unknown location parameter θ = {θ i : 1 ≤ i ≤ n}. This is the heteroskedastic version of the Gaussian predictive model studied in Komaki (2001); George et al (2006); Brown et al (2008); Xu and Zhou (2011). Letp(y|x) be any prde for the true density p(y|θ, ν)…”
Section: Predictive Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hereon, we describe our method first for the diagonal predictive set-up as it produces comparatively simpler expressions that can be intuitively studied and compared to the point estimation results of Xie, Kou, and Brown (2012) and the predictive KL results in Xu and Zhou (2011). The general results for non-diagonal set-ups along with their complete proofs are provided in George et al (2021, Section 1).…”
Section: Extension To Non-diagonal Predictive Set-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical Bayes (EB) approach was originally proposed by Robbins [3,4], soon after it had been studied in the literature [5][6][7][8][9]. Up to now, EB methods are commonly based on simple random sampling (SRS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%