2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical equation for preliminary assessment of soil texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater importance of MIR to explain the variation in physical‐hydric properties compared with Vis–NIR is attributed to its high sensitivity to identify quartz, with well‐defined features and peaks, throughout almost the entire spectrum (Janik et al, 1998; Jović et al, 2019; Viscarra Rossel et al, 2006). On the other hand, the Vis–NIR region does not present specific quartz features (Viscarra Rossel et al, 2006) and showed a lower capacity of explaining the WRC in sandy soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater importance of MIR to explain the variation in physical‐hydric properties compared with Vis–NIR is attributed to its high sensitivity to identify quartz, with well‐defined features and peaks, throughout almost the entire spectrum (Janik et al, 1998; Jović et al, 2019; Viscarra Rossel et al, 2006). On the other hand, the Vis–NIR region does not present specific quartz features (Viscarra Rossel et al, 2006) and showed a lower capacity of explaining the WRC in sandy soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gold plate was used for equipment calibration after every four samples. To reduce sampling noise, reflectance values between 500 and 400 cm −1 were removed (Jović et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil used for the model of the sample system was selected from soil samples that had been kept in the laboratory for 12 years, in which the percentage of organic matter was low (about 0.5%). To examine and influence the soil type and obtain a more reliable model, three basic soil types were used for five model system mixtures: pure Arenosol and pure Vertisol, as well as a mixture of the five most common soil types from northern Serbia 25 (Arenosol, Vertisol, Solonec, Chernozem, and Fluvisol). Each of the tested soil model mixtures was made by adding certain proportions of starch and nicotinamide and humic acids to a certain basic soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OSSL is made up of several SSLs that present a data-sharing policy. The latest version (v1.2) includes the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) - Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL) MIR [19–21] and VisNIR libraries, labeled , with the VisNIR dataset being sourced from the Rapid Carbon Assessment Project (RaCA) project from USDA-NRCS [22, 23]; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) MIR and VisNIR libraries, developed in cooperation with the International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) [24], labeled ; two MIR libraries of the Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) [25, 26], labeled as and ; the VisNIR library from the European Data Centre (ESDAC) — Joint Research Centre (JRC) as part of the Land Use/Cover Area frame statistical Survey (LUCAS soil of 2009, 2012, and 2015) [27], labeled ; the Central African MIR SSL developed by ETH Zurich in the Congo Basin [28], labeled ; a MIR library of New Zealand forest soils from researchers of Scion Research, NZ [29], labeled ; a MIR library of boreal soils from researchers of the University of Zurich [30], labeled ; and a subset of the Serbian SSL from the University of Novi Sad [31], labeled .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%