2007
DOI: 10.2167/jmmd537.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Evaluation of a Mathematical Model of Ethnolinguistic Vitality: The Case of Võro

Abstract: The paper presents the results of an empirical evaluation of a mathematical model of ethnolinguistic vitality. The model adds several new factors to the set used in previous models of ethnolinguistic vitality and operationalises it in a manner that would make it easier to compare the vitality of different groups. According to the model, the ethnolinguistic vitality (V) depends on the perceived cultural weight of one's own community (M 1 ) in relation to the weight of a relevant other community (M 2 ); perceive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assimilation theory (Gordon 1964) advocates for unidimensional acculturation, meaning that the deeper the acquisition of a new culture, the more marked is the displacement of the original one. The model of ethnolinguistic vitality (Giles, Bourhis, and Taylor 1977;Ehala 2010), used for example, for studying the Setos' neighboring group -Võro identity (Ehala and Niglas 2007) supports the latter paradigm on a group level. The strength of group identity or a group's ethnolinguistic vitality is measured in contrast to important out-groups.…”
Section: Acculturation and Bicultural Identitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Assimilation theory (Gordon 1964) advocates for unidimensional acculturation, meaning that the deeper the acquisition of a new culture, the more marked is the displacement of the original one. The model of ethnolinguistic vitality (Giles, Bourhis, and Taylor 1977;Ehala 2010), used for example, for studying the Setos' neighboring group -Võro identity (Ehala and Niglas 2007) supports the latter paradigm on a group level. The strength of group identity or a group's ethnolinguistic vitality is measured in contrast to important out-groups.…”
Section: Acculturation and Bicultural Identitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The theoretical model outlined in the previous section was operationalised in Ehala and Niglas (2007) in the form of a quantitative survey questionnaire which was further elaborated on the basis of its performance and for the requirements of the current study. In all, there are 60 statements in the questionnaire built on the Likert scale principle.…”
Section: The Design Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups sensitive to language prestige, such as women, younger residents, people with higher education, and urban dwellers (see Labov 2001 for underreporting;see Aikio 1994), reported less frequent use of South Estonian. Ehala and Niglas (2007) have noted that the dialect is neither utilized nor appreciated in the Estonian society. However, sociolinguistic studies suggest that Võru is still perceived by local people as the rightful rural community language in the Võru area of southeastern Estonia (Koreinik & Pajusalu 2007;Mets & Praakli 2007).…”
Section: Contextualizing South Estonianmentioning
confidence: 99%