1990
DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(90)90029-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical expression of permeability in terms of porosity, specific surface area, and residual water saturation of carbonate rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, the authors will present additional microbiostratigraphy of the Asmari Formation. In addition, the authors are preparing equations relating porosity to permeability for the Asmari limestone by introducing two additional variables, i.e., irreducible fluid saturation and specific surface area, which is a measure of fracturing (see Chilingar et al, 1990). …”
Section: Microbiostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, the authors will present additional microbiostratigraphy of the Asmari Formation. In addition, the authors are preparing equations relating porosity to permeability for the Asmari limestone by introducing two additional variables, i.e., irreducible fluid saturation and specific surface area, which is a measure of fracturing (see Chilingar et al, 1990). …”
Section: Microbiostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A data set published in the literature (Bagrintseva, 1977;Chilingarian et al, 1990) was used in this study to examine the permeability dependence on porous medium properties of carbonate reservoirs. The dataset was the combination of four different carbonate reservoirs located in former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics tabulated in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to sorting, porosity tends to increase for perfectly sorted media and decrease as sorting becomes poorer (Beard and Weyl, 1973), thus affecting permeability. In addition to modified forms of the Kozeny-Carman equation (Payatakes et al, 1973;Dullien, 1991;Panda and Lake, 1994;Panda and Lake, 1995;Koponen et al, 1997) various other empirical (Morrow et al, 1969;Beard and Weyl, 1973) and theoretical (Berg, 1970;Scheidegger, 1974) correlations to pore and textural characteristics of rocks have been proposed, as well as permeability estimations supported on saturation measurements (Chilingarian et al, 1990) and percolation and fractal concepts (Pape et al, 1999;Costa, 2006). However, the non-uniqueness of the equation or method proposed remains an un-resolved challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to modified forms of the Kozeny-Carman equation 6,[8][9][10][11] , various other empirical 7, 12 and theoretical 13,14 correlations to pore and textural characteristics of rocks have been proposed, as well as permeability estimations supported on saturation measurements 15 and percolation and fractal concepts 16,17 . However, the non-uniqueness of the equation or method proposed remains an un-resolved challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%