2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical formulas for predicting the insertion loss behind wedges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-35 dB in the shadowand view zone, and the average relative error is up to 0.67 dB in the view zone. The largest deviations are observed for virtual 1 To avoid potential singularity issues of BTMS [51] positions within 1.5° of the zone boundaries and of the extensions of the wedge planes were omitted. apex points outside the physical wedge, where the blending of two filters in UDFA deviates from the otherwise physicallybased design.…”
Section: Error and Computation Time Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…-35 dB in the shadowand view zone, and the average relative error is up to 0.67 dB in the view zone. The largest deviations are observed for virtual 1 To avoid potential singularity issues of BTMS [51] positions within 1.5° of the zone boundaries and of the extensions of the wedge planes were omitted. apex points outside the physical wedge, where the blending of two filters in UDFA deviates from the otherwise physicallybased design.…”
Section: Error and Computation Time Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HE wave properties of sound cause diffraction at edges and objects, with perceptually notable or specifically desired frequency-dependent attenuation, e.g., for sound barriers [1]. When the direct sound path is occluded, typically a low-pass characteristic is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation