“…When some Y i 's are missing, even if we modify the function ( X , Y , θ ) in to address the missing values, Wilks's theorem may break down unless a particular modified is used in . For example, when missingness is ignorable, that is, the propensity P ( δ = 1 | X , Y ) = π ( X ) is a function of X only, where δ is the indicator of whether Y is observed, Xue () showed that Wilks's theorem holds if in is replaced by where and are nonparametric regression estimators of π ( X ) and ( X , θ ) = E { ( X , Y , θ ) | X , δ = 1}, respectively. It was also shown that if we omit the second term on the right‐hand side of , then Wilks's theorem does not hold, although using such a in leads to an asymptotically valid estimator of θ 0 .…”