2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

58
1,272
12
35

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,111 publications
(1,513 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
58
1,272
12
35
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability is probably in large part due to the variability in exposure of the beaches involved to the deep water wave conditions. In contrast to the dependency of short-wave swash on beach face gradient, both Stockdon et al, (2006) and Senechal et al (2011) found no relationship between the infragravity swash height and beach face gradient. On the other hand Ruggiero et al (2004) found that the significant infragravity swash height was inversely related to beach gradient.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variability is probably in large part due to the variability in exposure of the beaches involved to the deep water wave conditions. In contrast to the dependency of short-wave swash on beach face gradient, both Stockdon et al, (2006) and Senechal et al (2011) found no relationship between the infragravity swash height and beach face gradient. On the other hand Ruggiero et al (2004) found that the significant infragravity swash height was inversely related to beach gradient.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Herein we define swash as the oscillations in the vertical shoreline elevation relative to the short-term mean shoreline elevation (e.g. Stockdon et al, 2006;Hughes et al, 2010). The mean shoreline elevation is determined by both the tide level and wave setup level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-shore displacements of the rfl between November and August as observed with video cameras (∆y vid ) were compared to the displacements observed with the LiDAR system (∆y lid ). Finally, in order to analyse the potential of the video system to obtain morphological parameters on the beach in a context of risk management, beachface slopes tan β bf , particularly used in runup empirical equations [34] and numerical models [67], were also calculated on these profiles using linear regression over the swash zone. In this paper, tan β bf was calculated between the maximum water level on the beach and the beachface toe.…”
Section: Shoreline Detection and Water Elevation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) use of semi-empirical formulas (Stockdon, 2006) to calculate the set-up (surge due to waves'breaking) and the run-up (altitude reached by the swash). Modelisation of the 1982 storm, due to lack of measured Littoral 2010 11003-p.4 data was done after validation of the model chain with better informed events (1997 and 2007).The total water level of inundation is then compared to the topographic data (MNT IGN) to deduce the areas concerned by marine submersion, and LIDAR topobathymetric data where available.…”
Section: Hazard Assessment Within Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%