2013
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2012.723820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical performance of models for barrier option valuation

Abstract: In this paper the empirical performance of five different models for barrier option valuation is investigated: the Black-Scholes model, the constant elasticity of variance model, the Heston stochastic volatility model, the Merton jump-diffusion model, and the infinite activity Variance Gamma model. We use time-series data from the USD/EUR exchange rate market: standard put and call (plain vanilla) option prices and a unique set of observed market values of barrier options. The models are calibrated to plain va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibrated Heston parameters. Column 2: for USD/EUR market data of 2 January 2004 -27 September 2005(Jessen and Poulsen 2013). Column 3: for EUR/USD market data of 22 August 2006(Elices and Giménez 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibrated Heston parameters. Column 2: for USD/EUR market data of 2 January 2004 -27 September 2005(Jessen and Poulsen 2013). Column 3: for EUR/USD market data of 22 August 2006(Elices and Giménez 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Unfortunately, different calibration criteria lead to different results, see Detlefsen and Härdle, 2007). In the same vein, Jessen and Poulsen (2009) find that different models, when calibrated to plain vanilla options, exhibit widely-differing pricing performance when used to explain actual prices of barrier options. Our results suggest that the lowly numerical optimisation itself can make a difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on barrier option prices covering the period 2 January 2004 to 27 September 2005 come from the risk‐management department of Danske Bank and a detailed description of the data set can be found in Jessen & Poulsen (). We considered only UOC barrier options and excluded options with values lower than 105 in our evaluation of the hedging performance.…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%