2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2011.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical prediction models for adaptive resource provisioning in the cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
263
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 548 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
263
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, they are also criticized more often for their associated unwanted behaviour, termed as bumpy transition, that could lead the system to an oscillatory state [27,104,105]. On the other hand, knowledge-based control solutions utilizing machine learning [67,106,107] or neural networks [99,108] provide high levels of flexibility and adaptivity. However, such flexibility and adaptivity come at the cost of long training delays, poor scalability, slower convergence rate, and the impossibility of deriving stability proof [7,18,103,109].…”
Section: Discussion Issues and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, they are also criticized more often for their associated unwanted behaviour, termed as bumpy transition, that could lead the system to an oscillatory state [27,104,105]. On the other hand, knowledge-based control solutions utilizing machine learning [67,106,107] or neural networks [99,108] provide high levels of flexibility and adaptivity. However, such flexibility and adaptivity come at the cost of long training delays, poor scalability, slower convergence rate, and the impossibility of deriving stability proof [7,18,103,109].…”
Section: Discussion Issues and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islam et al [24] propose resource prediction approaches based on machine learning. More specifically, they propose and experiment with Linear Regression and an Error Correction Neural Network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islam et al [12] present an approach for predicting the aggregated percentage of CPU utilisation of VMs running a distributed web benchmark, using both error correction neural networks (ECNN) and linear regression (LR). Their results suggest that although using ECNN yields better prediction results than, the need to retrain the neural network might be a disadvantage compared to the use of LR.…”
Section: Time Series Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%