2016
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2016.2565265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Vibration Synthesis Method for Electric Machines by Transfer Functions and Electromagnetic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, experimental analysis is implemented to predict the deformation in SW to restrict the vibrations in the machine. It is observed that there is a good comparison between the experimental vs numerical approaches in predicting the frequencies [23][24][25][26][27]. Therefore, reducing the vibrations in the test motor is important to increase the life of the machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, experimental analysis is implemented to predict the deformation in SW to restrict the vibrations in the machine. It is observed that there is a good comparison between the experimental vs numerical approaches in predicting the frequencies [23][24][25][26][27]. Therefore, reducing the vibrations in the test motor is important to increase the life of the machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the main components are distributed in the maximum deformation area far away from the resonance frequency point to avoid large relative deformation between the components on the transmission path during the vibrator process [ 4 , 27 , 28 ]. This relative deformation results in damage to the connections on the electrical transmission path, creating a PIM risk [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has gained interest over the last decade thanks to the exhaustive work of Boesing et al [6], e.g. for combined experimental and numerical predictions [7], or as a quick alternative to standard FE methods reviewed in [8]. However consistent comparisons with FE methods in terms of accuracy against computational efforts is not documented to the authors knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%