2009
DOI: 10.1057/bm.2009.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employer branding and market segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable work on the matching process between potential employees and employers, much of it based upon the idea of organisation-person fit and some on how different groups (age, ethnicity) might respond differently to the same employer brand (Lievens and Slaughter, 2016). The more general idea of segmenting potential employees into different groups so that their specific needs or characteristics can be addressed more effectively is also recognised (Moroko and Uncles, 2009). However, there appears to be little or no work applying the idea of segmentation to existing employees, identifying the specific needs of different types based upon their demographics and role.…”
Section: Segmentation and The Employer Brandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable work on the matching process between potential employees and employers, much of it based upon the idea of organisation-person fit and some on how different groups (age, ethnicity) might respond differently to the same employer brand (Lievens and Slaughter, 2016). The more general idea of segmenting potential employees into different groups so that their specific needs or characteristics can be addressed more effectively is also recognised (Moroko and Uncles, 2009). However, there appears to be little or no work applying the idea of segmentation to existing employees, identifying the specific needs of different types based upon their demographics and role.…”
Section: Segmentation and The Employer Brandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantic differential is a list of opposite adjective scales (the method was invented by Osgood, Suci and Tannenbaum (1957)). Initially, the semantic differential was developed to measure the connotative meaning of terms.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employer branding has gained favour as a management tool over the last decade. Even as fi rms face global economic conditions that are both diffi cult to forecast and subject to extreme variance, the need to attract, retain and motivate staff remains (Moroko & Uncles, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a considerable literature available on theoretical foundation and conceptual frame work (Ambler & Barrow 1996;Backhaus & Tikoo, 2004;Edwards, 2010;Lievenset al,2007;Moroko& Uncles, 2009;Mosley, 2007;Wildenet al,2010;Bendaravičienė, 2016), generalization and of dimensionality of employer branding (Hillebrandt & Ivens 2013, Berthonet al,2005, employer branding as a tool to attract potential employees (Highhouseet al,2007:Highhouseet al, 2003Devendorf&Highhouse, 2008;Schreurset al, 2009;Zaveri & Mulye 2010Ehrhart&Ziegert, 2005, Lievenset al,2001Lievens, 2007;Lievens&Highhouse, 2003;Yu, 2014, Kausel & Slaughter, 2011Lievenset al,2005;Turban, 2001;Jiang & Iles 2011;Shahzadet al,2011), employer branding outcomes (Davies, 2008, Cable & Edwards, 2004, Fulmer et al,2003Mosley, 2007), effects of corporate social performance (Turban & Greening 1997;Albinger& Freeman, 2000), and characteristics of successful employer brands (Moroko & Uncles, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%