2021
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2021.3056673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employing Weibull Analysis and Weakest Link Theory to Resolve Crystalline Silicon PV Cell Strength Between Bare Cells and Reduced- and Full-Sized Modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same module loading condition, cells within larger modules are more likely to fracture [38]. Thus, larger modules are potentially susceptible to more frequent cell breakage due to weather, shipping, handling, or installation.…”
Section: A Larger Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the same module loading condition, cells within larger modules are more likely to fracture [38]. Thus, larger modules are potentially susceptible to more frequent cell breakage due to weather, shipping, handling, or installation.…”
Section: A Larger Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using larger wafers may increase the risk of damage during the handling, manufacturing, and packaging of large-format modules. Larger wafers are more susceptible to cracking than smaller wafers [38]. However, the most important reliability considerations relate to cell-cutting processes and the resulting cut-cell dimensions, which are discussed as follows.…”
Section: B Larger Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the observed V th is considered to coincide with the smallest V th among the k OTS paths. In other words, the weakest link model [30][31][32][33] scaled by the area ratio k holds.…”
Section: Size Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all relevant scales cannot be resolved within the same model without incurring extreme computational cost, analyzing detailed stress profiles within the module requires propagation of a module scale load such as wind or snow pressure to a subscale model of the subcomponent of interest. This can be done by operating separate models for each scale, whereby the full module scale model contains a simplified representation of cells without metallization details, 5,6 and domain transfers are utilized to propagate boundary conditions to the sub-scale model containing details of interest such as interconnections and their effects on cells. 7,8 Since the propagated boundary is typically a simple equation-driven curvature or surface profile, 7 and the module itself is a geometrically regular structure, some potential for reducing computational expense at the module scale appears possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%