1996
DOI: 10.1108/01437729610127668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity: assessing the differences

Abstract: Affirmative action in the USA, and employment equity in Canada, are policy frameworks that have developed through the use of legislation, regulation and decisions by courts and administrative tribunals, as mechanisms for addressing discrimination in employment. Managing diversity, in contrast, is a voluntary initiative by corporate decision makers, at the level of the firm, in response to the growth of diversity in the workforce and marketplace. Provides a framework for comparing and assessing the three approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
105
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1986, Canada did the same by launching the employment equity act program which was seeking to enhance a fairer employment system, understand the constraints faced by ethnic minorities and women in the workplace, and also ensure a fair numerical representation of minorities in different Canadian organizations (Agocs and Burr, 1996).…”
Section: Diversity and Diversity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1986, Canada did the same by launching the employment equity act program which was seeking to enhance a fairer employment system, understand the constraints faced by ethnic minorities and women in the workplace, and also ensure a fair numerical representation of minorities in different Canadian organizations (Agocs and Burr, 1996).…”
Section: Diversity and Diversity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on indirect EEPs is of course also very interesting. There is a significant tradition of such policies in the US under the name of affirmative action (Agocs & Burr 1996;Appelt & Jarosch 2000;Bovenkerk 1986;Glazer 1987Glazer , 2000Holzer & Neumark 2000;Kelly & Dobbin 1998;Leonard 1990;Skrentny 1996), in Canada under various names (Abella 1984(Abella , 1985Adams et al 1995 , except in the cases of Sweden (Soininen & Graham 2000) and the Netherlands, where they were part of early integration policies for immigrants (Abell et al 1995;Bacchi 1994;Glastra et al 1998;Gras & Bovenkerk 1995;Jonkers 2003;Smeets 1993). Even a first glance at this literature on indirect EEPs shows that the variation is great and that such policies and programmes are still hot topics for both politicians and researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1986, Canada did the same by launching the employment equity act program which was seeking to enhance a fairer employment system, understand the constraints faced by ethnic minorities and women in the workplace, and also ensure a fair numerical representation of minorities in different Canadian organizations (Agocs & Burr, 1996). It is needless to say that many other countries like Malaysia, India, Britain and South Africa acted in the same way by facing the cultural discrimination existing in both their public and private businesses (Jain, 1998).…”
Section: Literature Review Cultural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%