2010
DOI: 10.1891/0047-2220.41.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employment Outcomes among Individuals with Visual Impairments: The Role of Client Satisfaction and Acceptance of Vision Loss

Abstract: This study examined the relationship of client satisfaction with the vocational rehabilitation (VR) process and acceptance of vision loss with respect to employment outcomes among former VR clients with visual impairments. Participants were 128 clients of the Michigan Commission for the Blind (MCB) whose cases were closed between fiscal years 2003 and 2004. The results of a logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who reported higher levels of client satisfaction and who focused on their remain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the included studies met an average of 1.85 ( SD = 1.72) of the eight quality indicators, with a range of zero to six. Ten studies met zero to two QIs; the remaining studies ( n = 3) met three (Hagemoser, 1996), four (Jo et al, 2010), and six (Capella-McDonnall, 2005) QIs. The most commonly met quality indicator was multivariable analyses ( n = 6), followed by assumptions met ( n = 4) and power calculation ( n = 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the included studies met an average of 1.85 ( SD = 1.72) of the eight quality indicators, with a range of zero to six. Ten studies met zero to two QIs; the remaining studies ( n = 3) met three (Hagemoser, 1996), four (Jo et al, 2010), and six (Capella-McDonnall, 2005) QIs. The most commonly met quality indicator was multivariable analyses ( n = 6), followed by assumptions met ( n = 4) and power calculation ( n = 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant interaction effects for transportation self-efficacy indicated that the effect of transportation self-efficacy on employment decreased with age and increased with age at onset; effect sizes for transportation self-efficacy for these interaction effects were very small to small ( OR = 0.96–2.38), with statistically significant OR s ranging from 1.29 to 2.38. In one study (Jo et al, 2010), researchers examined different dimensions of acceptance of vision loss in relation to employment; only the “Transformation of Comparative-Status Values” Scale had a significant effect ( OR = 1.15 per one-unit increase). Psychosocial variables that were not significant predictors of employment included depression, obsessiveness, Type A behavior, work motivation, family support, family problems, encouragement from family and friends ( OR = 1.70), satisfaction with social contact ( OR = 1.59), and three of the social network variables investigated by Cimarolli and Wang.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to other health conditions, there is also evidence to suggest that acceptance following the loss of hearing and/or vision can be adaptive for psychological adjustment. For instance, acceptance can help AWSLs to prepare for future challenges and the potential of further loss (Jo, Chen, & Kosciulek, ; Karlsson, ; Lepore, ), and it has been found to be indicative of individuals’ responsiveness to intervention, ability to enjoy life, and general mental health (De Leo, Hickey, Meneghel, & Cantor, ; Heine & Browning, ; Tabrett & Latham, ). However, while acceptance has been identified as beneficial for the preservation of well‐being, no studies have investigated the role of acceptance of sensory loss within a dyadic, relational context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their four subscales rated on a 4-point Likert score reflected four dimensions of adaptation to the impairment process. In previous studies (Chen et al, 2015;Jo et al, 2010), reliability values of .89 and .934 for the scale have been recorded. The creation and validation of the Self-Acceptance Scale for Persons with Early Blindness (SAS-EB) were undertaken by Morgado et al (2014).…”
Section: Acceptance Of Disability Scale (Ads)mentioning
confidence: 92%