Empower the Workforce, Empower the Company?  Citizen Development Adoption

Hoogsteen, Doortje; Borgman, Hans P.

doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.575

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…LCNC has been reported in various domains, including healthcare, education, manufacturing, blockchain, artificial intelligence, e-commerce, mobile applications, corporate services, request handling, etc. [15]. LCNC software development is compatible with Agile methodology since they both emphasize an iterative and frequent delivery strategy with ongoing stakeholder interaction [16,17].…”

Section: Low Code/no Codementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study discovered twelve factors that promote the adoption of LCDPs, as well as nineteen factors that hinder their adoption [12]. In addition, Hoogsteen et al [15] employed an extended Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to identify influential factors in organizational decisions to adopt LCDP. Factors like risk perceptions, active top management support, alignment between business and IT through a projectbased approach, centralized IT governance, and utilization of business network systems significantly impact adoption decisions.…”

Section: Low Code/no Codementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Enhancing Business Efficiency through Low-Code/No-Code Technology Adoption: Insights from an Extended UTAUT Model

Abdul Razak,

Phey Ernn,

Yussoff

et al. 2024

J. Hum. Earth Future

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing need for new applications and software has driven developers to seek quick development options. As a result, the low-code/no-code technology platform emerges as a potential option, leading to the adoption of low-code and no-code technologies in enterprises becoming a focus of inquiry. This study aims to examine users' behavioral intentions toward the adoption of the low-code/no-code technology platform, considering the increasing need for new applications. The Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model serves as the theoretical framework for understanding the factors influencing individuals’ intentions to adopt low-code or no-code technologies. The study focused on the five key components of the model: Performance Expectation (PE), Effort Expectation (EE), Social Influence (SI), Perceived Risk (PR), and Perceived Cost (PC). Based on the surveys and data analysis techniques, the findings show relationship between these five categories with an individual's Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt low-code/no-code technologies. Furthermore, the analysis identifies the most significant BI construct. These findings are beneficial to businesses seeking to enhance efficiency and expedite application development processes in response to increasing digital demands. In general, this study contributes to the topic of technology adoption and improves our understanding of the practicality of the Extended UTAUT model. Doi: 10.28991/HEF-2024-05-01-07 Full Text: PDF

show abstract

Section: Low Code/no Codementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Low Code/no Codementioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Business Efficiency through Low-Code/No-Code Technology Adoption: Insights from an Extended UTAUT Model

Abdul Razak,

Phey Ernn,

Yussoff

et al. 2024

J. Hum. Earth Future

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The key benefit of citizen developers is that they have a significantly deeper understanding of the overall business process [72], which the to-be-developed application should support. Therefore, this archetype resonates with the marketing statement of LCDPs to enable citizen developers to develop less sophisticated applications [35].…”

Section: Adoption and Non-adoption Archetypesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multiple Mini Case Study on the Adoption of Low Code Development Platforms in Work Systems

Käss,

Strahringer,

Westner

2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although adopting Low Code Development Platforms (LCDPs) promises significant efficiency and effectiveness improvements for application development, its adoption still needs further empirical research. This paper uses a combinatorial approach to research LCDP adoption and presents the results of a multiple mini case study with 36 cases on LCDP adoption. A combination of the Socio-Technical Systems theory and the Technology-Organisational-Environment model is used as a theoretical lens. In this paper, we show that LCDP adoption is a multifaceted phenomenon and identify three archetypes for LCDP adoption (i.e., IT Resource Shortage Mitigators, Application Development Democratisers, and Synergy Realisers) and one archetype for LCDP non-adoption (i.e., Intricacy Adversaries). Each archetype can be interpreted as an individual path towards LCDP (non-)adoption. Based on these archetypes, we derive seven starting points for practitioners to adopt LCDPs in work systems. Moreover, by using the theoretical lenses, the paper shows that for an LCDP adoption to occur, an optimisation of the social and technical sub-systems is required.

show abstract

“…oftware applications play an essential role in organizations. 1 The growing demand and complexity of software, along with the need to upgrade legacy systems often developed with obsolete technologies 2 and maintained with scarce skilled human resources, 3 stimulate the creation of new development methods and technologies to enable software development to be more productive.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Low-Code Versus Code-Based Software Development: Which Wins the Productivity Game?

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software is becoming increasingly larger and complex, and companies should be aware of which technologies and platforms allow for higher productivity, that then translates into lower costs, shorter development times, and fewer required specialized resources. This article presents the results of an experiment carried out to compare the productivity of two low-code/code-based software development technologies. The results show that the development and maintenance of software with low-code technology is significantly faster, thus supporting the high potential of this technology. The key lesson is that low-code technology needs to be seriously taken into account by companies because of the potential productivity increase it represents for the development of management information systems.

show abstract

Empower the Workforce, Empower the Company? Citizen Development Adoption

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

Enhancing Business Efficiency through Low-Code/No-Code Technology Adoption: Insights from an Extended UTAUT Model

Enhancing Business Efficiency through Low-Code/No-Code Technology Adoption: Insights from an Extended UTAUT Model

A Multiple Mini Case Study on the Adoption of Low Code Development Platforms in Work Systems

Low-Code Versus Code-Based Software Development: Which Wins the Productivity Game?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About