Empowerment in five‐star hotels: choice, voice or rhetoric?

Abstract

This article highlights the ambiguities and debates surrounding the meaning, application, purpose and concomitants of the concept of empowerment presented in the service management literature and argues that these flow from the attempt to reconcile the need for control to secure employee compliance with the need to cede a degree of autonomy to secure co‐operation and initiative. It shows how empowerment is conceived primarily in terms of “choice” ‐ increase discretion over how work if performed ‐ rather than “voice” ‐ greater involvement in organizational decision‐making ‐ and is increasingly regarded as a particular and contingent management strategy in which control via regulation and supervision is replaced by more indirect controls. A study of five‐star hotels in Amsterdam is reported which shows that, despite managerial rhetoric, there was little “empowerment” in practice and what there was amounted to increased employee responsibility rather than greater choice over how work was done or more voice in organizational decisions and that supporting forms of recruitment, training and remuneration were mostly absent.

Is the Relationship between Employees’ Psychological Empowerment and Employees’ Job Satisfaction Contingent on the Transformational Leadership? A Study on the Yemeni Islamic Banks

“…Researchers approach the psychological empowerment construct from different perspectives. For example, from the behavior and relationship perspective Hales and Klidas (1998) defined empowerment as sharing knowledge and the level of information and power with subordinates. Conger and Kanungo (1988) related the empowerment, as a motivational concept, to self-efficacy and therefore defined empowerment as the improvement of the self-efficacy feeling of employees.…”

The Relationships between Structural and Psychological Empowerment of Teachers and Their Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

“…Güçlendirmenin amacı, bireylerin çalıştıkları ortamlarda ortaya çıkan sorunların üstesinden gelmek için gerekli bilgi, becerilere ve inanca sahip olmalarıdır. Bunun sağlanabilmesi için çalışanların işlerinde özerkliklerinin artırılması (Fatima, Iqbal ve Imran, 2013), onlara yetki ve sorumluluk verilmesi, bilgi ve gücün onlarla paylaşılması (Hales ve Klidas, 1998) gerekmektedir. Bu anlamda güçlendirme, yetki devri kavramını çağrıştırmaktadır.…”

Factors Affecting Employee Satisfaction of the Public and Private Sector Organizations of Pakistan

“…Employee Empowerment (Carless, 2004;Haas, 2010) suggested that Employee empowerment refers to the authority endorsed to employees in decision-making in routine activities Hales and Klidas (1998) state when you share your authority and power with your underlings you are practicing empowerment. Empowerment is a construct associated to the employee`s confidence on their selves and the motivation and inspiration to work Conger and Kanungo (1988).…”