2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.050507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emulating Many-Body Localization with a Superconducting Quantum Processor

Abstract: The law of statistical physics dictates that generic closed quantum many-body systems initialized in nonequilibrium will thermalize under their own dynamics. However, the emergence of manybody localization (MBL) owing to the interplay between interaction and disorder, which is in stark contrast to Anderson localization that only addresses noninteracting particles in the presence of disorder, greatly challenges this concept because it prevents the systems from evolving to the ergodic thermalized state. One crit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
222
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
222
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although energy scaling arguments [52] suggest that manybody localization does not occur in Dim > 1, at least in the thermodynamic limit, signatures of localization have been observed in two-dimensional disordered optical lattices [53]. Localization has also been observed in small ion trap systems of up to 10 long-range interacting spins [54,55]. Penning traps offer an order of magnitude increase in the number of spins, which makes them an ideal setup for simulating two-dimensional physics.…”
Section: B Details Of the Lr Ising Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although energy scaling arguments [52] suggest that manybody localization does not occur in Dim > 1, at least in the thermodynamic limit, signatures of localization have been observed in two-dimensional disordered optical lattices [53]. Localization has also been observed in small ion trap systems of up to 10 long-range interacting spins [54,55]. Penning traps offer an order of magnitude increase in the number of spins, which makes them an ideal setup for simulating two-dimensional physics.…”
Section: B Details Of the Lr Ising Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As experimentally demonstrated in [49], the many-body localized state may be still attainable within a short time scale when the thermalization rate of the system with N t 0, 0…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Circuitmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…define the new x-and y-components of Pauli matrix as x k corresponds to the long-range spin-spin interaction, B=E J plays the role of the external field, and the inhomogeneity D k =E J,k −E J acts as the site-dependent disordered potential. Unlike the superconducting circuit in[49], the nearest-neighbor J k,k±1 do not dominate. The last term in H Ising with at the sweet point N g1 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The second line in Eq. (1) represents the SSH interaction Hamiltonian with tunable coupling strengths t 1 and t 2 , which could be implemented in superconducting qubit circuits [37,38,[53][54][55][56][57]. Thus, we here assume that t 1 = t 0 (1 − cos ϕ) and t 2 = t 0 (1 + cos ϕ) with a tunable parameter ϕ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavity induced coupling between two edge modes-. When the cavity is far detuned from qubits, i.e., g 0 ∆ 0 (let ∆ 0 = ω 0 −ω c ), virtual-photons-mediated interactions among qubits g 2 0 /∆ 0 can be obtained [38,56], as shown in Fig. 1(d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%