2009
DOI: 10.1080/10447310903025560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling Collaborative Work Across Different Communities of Practice Through Boundary Objects: Field Studies in Air Traffic Management

Abstract: A recently developed decision support tool provides a common information space to share information directly across numerous air traffic control facilities. This tool is unusual in that its displays can be used as boundary objects, which are entities in which decontextualized information is presented in the same form to all participants in the collaboration. Through an analysis of the results of 2 years of field tests, this article discusses the benefits of this arrangement, particularly in comparison to alter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the two hypotheses that are not supported by the data are both concerned with properties that address the use and management of EA models rather than their construction-up-to-dateness and accessibility. An explanation for the lacking support of accessibility for a syntactic capacity might be that boundary objects emerge from the communities' work practices, and can only be partly pre-designed (Landry et al 2009). The low empirical support for up-to-dateness indicates that this property does not contribute significantly to a pragmatic capacity of boundary objects.…”
Section: Discussion Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, the two hypotheses that are not supported by the data are both concerned with properties that address the use and management of EA models rather than their construction-up-to-dateness and accessibility. An explanation for the lacking support of accessibility for a syntactic capacity might be that boundary objects emerge from the communities' work practices, and can only be partly pre-designed (Landry et al 2009). The low empirical support for up-to-dateness indicates that this property does not contribute significantly to a pragmatic capacity of boundary objects.…”
Section: Discussion Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is because of the increasingly distributed and collaborative nature of control over important flight parameters that is envisaged in NextGen (Langan-Fox et al, 2009). Indeed, the development of tools for facilitating collaboration and coordination between various controllers and pilots is going to be an essential component of the airspace of the future (Landry, Levin, Rowe, & Nickelson, 2010). Nonetheless, there are important theoretical debates regarding what is required to maintain SA in a collaborative system.…”
Section: Sa In Collaborative Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…BOs may take many forms, comprising tangible everyday objects such as tools or workplace documents, heroic people, project timelines and information systems, or intangible concepts such as social structures, relationships, ideas and notions, and language and expressions (Benn and Martin 2010;Bergman, Lyytinen and Mark 2007;Bresnen 2010;Carlile 2002;Chang, Hatcher and Kim 2013;Di Marco, Alin and Taylor 2012;Fenton 2007;Fleischmann 2006;Harvey 2009;Huang and Huang 2013;Kajamaa 2011;Landry et al 2010;Lee-Kelley and Blackman 2012;Oswick and Robertson 2009;Sullivan and Williams 2012;Yakura 2002). In fact, Bergman, Lyytinen and Mark (2007, p. 55) state that "any artefact that is shared between two or more actors at the boundary of two social worlds can be regarded as a boundary object."…”
Section: Boundary Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%