2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling fast charging – A battery technology gap assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
304
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
304
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower state of charge (SOC) limit, 10%, is assumed to avoid consumer range anxiety, and the higher one, 80%, is assumed to mitigate accelerated aging and safety concerns during fast charging. There are examples of FC lasting 8 to 10 min, also known as extremely fast charging (XFC) [20]. Today's EV charging technology distinguishes three levels of EV battery charging.…”
Section: Ev Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower state of charge (SOC) limit, 10%, is assumed to avoid consumer range anxiety, and the higher one, 80%, is assumed to mitigate accelerated aging and safety concerns during fast charging. There are examples of FC lasting 8 to 10 min, also known as extremely fast charging (XFC) [20]. Today's EV charging technology distinguishes three levels of EV battery charging.…”
Section: Ev Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the cell cost is shown to increase sharply to 196 USD/kWh. The incremental cost of reducing the charging time from 55 to 10 min is 126 USD/kWh [20]. Table 1 also provides details of DCFC costs and charging characteristics and their comparison to XFC given in study [30].…”
Section: Ev Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 It is widely recognized that modern LIB fast charging is limited by safety and performance issues originating at the negative graphite electrode. 3,4 The charge process requires the release of Li + from the positive electrode and insertion of Li + into the graphite negative electrode (Eq. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantify the Li detection limit of the technique to be approximately 4 mAh plated Li per gram graphite, showing that this method has high sensitivity and significant commercial promise.It is widely recognized that modern LIB fast charging is limited by safety and performance issues originating at the negative graphite electrode. 3,4 The charge process requires the release of Li + from the positive electrode and insertion of Li + into the graphite negative electrode (Eq. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%