2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting futures in postnormal times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these points above, the practices of future design can be expected to have more implications than the social learning type of effects associated with backcasting and other relevant methods (Robinson 2003;Quist and Vergragt 2006;Kuzmanovic and Gaffney 2017;Ligtvoet et al 2016). Researchers conducted interviews with imaginary future generation participants to examine their way of thinking in greater detail and found that some of the prominent characteristics associated with those who represented imaginary future generations were as follows (Nakagawa et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to these points above, the practices of future design can be expected to have more implications than the social learning type of effects associated with backcasting and other relevant methods (Robinson 2003;Quist and Vergragt 2006;Kuzmanovic and Gaffney 2017;Ligtvoet et al 2016). Researchers conducted interviews with imaginary future generation participants to examine their way of thinking in greater detail and found that some of the prominent characteristics associated with those who represented imaginary future generations were as follows (Nakagawa et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this concept, decision making and vision design are achieved by negotiation and consensus building between the present and imaginary future generations. While other attempts to allow people to experience envisioned futures have been carried out (Oliver 2008;Kuzmanovic and Gaffney 2017), there has yet to be a study in which an imaginary future generation is created as a stakeholder that can take part in decisionmaking processes to reconcile intergenerational conflicts and thus achieve sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of futures studies, fiction writing as a technique is used in participatory research contexts. In some practices, these writings are brought to life, used as a base for playful exercises or staged interventions that surpass the potential of textual scenarios (Candy and Dunagan 2017;Kuzmanovic and Gaffney 2017). Radio, theatre, video games, films can be used as a method or as a form of dissemination, to enable people's deeper engagement in thought and discussion.…”
Section: Futures and Fictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-developing new narratives, authentic visions, and intelligent strategies allows for a sense of natural ownership and commitment, which can lead to collective foresight with an understanding of shared challenges and a common vision for change, and can call forth commitment and action (Ramos 2006(Ramos , 2017. Furthermore, the integration of experiential methods throughout the co-creation process -using techniques from improvisation, play and meditation, enhances embodied, multi-modal, and holistic explorations of futures (Kuzmanovic and Gaffney 2017). In this study, we shed light on the participatory nature of the process, providing a transparent audit trail of the approach developed to reach the stage of live broadcasting and how different voices were taken into account.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%