Enacting the social

Law, John; Urry, John

doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716

Cited by 1,029 publications

(684 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

632

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A TAR é também particularmente relevante no campo dos EO, o qual tende a subestimar como o organizar é entrelaçado pela materialidade (ORLIKOWSKI, 2007), que tem encontrado crescente interesse de autores nacionais (vide: ALCADIPANI; TURETA, 2009). Por fim, argumentar que a realidade está em permanente construção sugere não apenas uma perspectiva ontológica, tratando-se também de uma afirmação política (LAW; URRY, 2004;LAW, 2007), de modo que a TAR possui assim uma ontologia política (MOL, 1999(MOL, , 2002LAW, 2004;URRY, 2004) ao considerar que as condições de possibilidades nunca são dadas de antemão (MOL, 1999). No âmbito dos EO, essa ontologia política pode ser expressa em termos de uma política do organizar, o que significa pesquisar o lado obscuro e problemático inerente às formas de organizar dominantes, buscando assim compreender como fenômenos tais como imperativos pelo lucro, patriarcado, desigualdade racial e irresponsabilidade ecológica, por exemplo, podem ser considerados resultados de processos de organizar, de ordenamentos heterogêneos e continuamente performados (ALCADIPANI; HASSARD, 2010).…”

Section: Contribuições Do Organizar (Organizing) Para Os Estudos Orgaunclassified

Contribuições do organizar (organizing) para os Estudos Organizacionais

Duarte

Alcadipani

2016

Organ. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoA ncorado em um estilo de pensamento pós-moderno, este artigo fomenta uma discussão acerca dos processos de organizar (organizing), como uma abordagem que lança um novo olhar sobre as organizações e seus fenômenos, os quais passam a ser compreendidos como realizações, como resultados de processos heterogêneos contínuos e precários que, por estarem em constante produção, geram uma aparente estabilidade. Apresentamos a noção do organizar, suas origens, algumas perspectivas sobre o tema e quais seriam suas possíveis contribuições e implicações para o campo dos Estudos Organizacionais (EO), em termos de prática de pesquisa e ensino. Concluímos que a perspectiva do organizar pode contribuir para a desnaturalização da noção de organização enquanto estrutura rígida, homogênea e não problemática, alinhando-se também à discussão acerca da predominância das metanarrativas organizacionais. Assim, o organizar se apresenta como uma alternativa para o estudo das organizações e suas complexidades, gerando reflexões e esforços em termos de ensino e pesquisa.Palavras-chave: Organizar. Organizing. Ontologia. Pós-modernismo. Pós--estruturalismo. AbstractB ased on a postmodern style of thought, this article encourages a discussion about the processes of organizing as an approach that takes a fresh look at the organizations and its phenomena, which are to be understood as achievements, as results of heterogeneous, continuous and precarious processes which, for being in constant production, generate an apparent stability. We seek to present the notion of organizing, its origins, some of its perspectives and what could be their potential contributions and implications for the field of organizational studies, in terms of research and teaching practice. We conclude that organizing can contribute to the denaturalization of the notion of organization as rigid, homogeneous and unproblematic structure. It is also aligned to the discussion about the prevalence of organizational metanarratives. Thus, organizing is presented as an alternative to the study of organizations and their complexities, generating ideas and efforts in terms of teaching and research.

show abstract

Section: Contribuições Do Organizar (Organizing) Para Os Estudos Orgaunclassified

Contribuições do organizar (organizing) para os Estudos Organizacionais

Duarte

Alcadipani

2016

Organ. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For ontological position, practical constructivism assumes that social reality is an on-going process of creation, and emphasizes the emergent, enacted character of reality instead of being concerned about the existence of social reality dependent or independent of our perceptions of it. Practical constructivism assumes that social realities are relational effects (Law & Urry, 2004). Practical constructivism does not deny that social reality can be real (Law & Urry, 2004, p. 396).…”

Section: Accountabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, practical constructivism emphasizes that there is "… no definite social reality that can be discovered" (Kjellberg & Helgesson, 2006, p. 841). As far as the epistemological position is concerned, practical constructivism takes a position that social reality is constituted and shaped through continuous and extended interactions, associations and performative effects of different practices (Kjellberg & Helgesson, 2006;Law, 1994;Law & Urry, 2004). These practices are performed by a variety of actors with different versions and interpretations of social reality and logics of actions.…”

Section: Accountabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These practices are performed by a variety of actors with different versions and interpretations of social reality and logics of actions. The interactions and contestations between multiplicity of practices and entities as well as between theoretical influences shape and reshape social reality (Kjellberg & Helgesson, 2006;Law, 1994;Law & Urry, 2004). Consequently, practical constructivism assumes that multiple truths can be enacted depending on the purpose, interpretations, context and the way they are associated with, and affect, one another.…”

Section: Accountabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Organizational Learning: Evidence from a Petroleum Company

Usman¹,

Hameed²

2017

BER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evaluation based on subjective worth, rather than (supposedly) objective calculation, implies the possibility of overlapping, competing, or even conflicting orders of value. Valuation proliferates through multiple productions of the social, which we might say, with Law and Urry (2004) …”

Section: Frictions Of Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern

Roscoe

Townley

2015

Journal of Cultural Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

'Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern'What are public goods -of any kind -worth? How are they valued, and made valuable?What expertise is involved in their production? Questions over the value of public goods -a sporting championship, the arts, scientific advances or quality of life -figure prominently in our public and political discourse, as politicians and administrators struggle to manage the often competing claims of instrumental, economic reason and intangible, cultural evaluations.We must decide not only what characteristics and 'goods' to value, but how to value them, sometimes in the less than fully-realized knowledge that modes of valuation are performative

show abstract

Enacting the social

Cited by 1,029 publications

References 48 publications

Contribuições do organizar (organizing) para os Estudos Organizacionais

Contribuições do organizar (organizing) para os Estudos Organizacionais

The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Organizational Learning: Evidence from a Petroleum Company

Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About