2021
DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2021.1999919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enactive and ecological dynamics approaches: complementarity and differences for interventions in physical education lessons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite some shared interests that have been proposed (e.g. Adé et al, 2022;Bruineberg et al, 2021;Seifert et al, 2016), we have 'red-flagged' several epistemological and methodological issues that limit the potential rapprochement between ecological and enactive frameworks. We conclude by suggesting how an ecological…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite some shared interests that have been proposed (e.g. Adé et al, 2022;Bruineberg et al, 2021;Seifert et al, 2016), we have 'red-flagged' several epistemological and methodological issues that limit the potential rapprochement between ecological and enactive frameworks. We conclude by suggesting how an ecological…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite some shared interests that have been proposed (e.g. Adé et al, 2022; Bruineberg et al, 2021; Seifert et al, 2016), we have ‘red-flagged’ several epistemological and methodological issues that limit the potential rapprochement between ecological and enactive frameworks. We conclude by suggesting how an ecological dynamics perspective could offer pathways for the presented enactive approach to go beyond the course of in-formation, notably in investigating dynamics of action by considering methodologies used to study emergent behaviours in complex dynamical systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This integrated methodology goes beyond the divisions between the quantitative and qualitative data analysis to retain benefits of different types of evidence, increasing the strength of studies and diminishing the weaknesses of studies from a single perspective (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004). This methodological approach was initially used by Camerino et al (2019) in a PE teaching context, and then more recently by Adé et al (2022), Girard et al (2022) and Vors and Bourcier (2022). Overall, mixed methods research has five key aims (Greene et al 1989): (a) triangulation of results from different methods, (b) investigating complementarity of findings between different methods, (c) developing use of findings from one method to help inform implementation of another method, (d) stimulating innovations that seek new perspectives of frameworks and (e) seeking to expand the breadth and range of an inquiry by using different methods for different components of the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%