Dental Anthropology 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-7496-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enamel Hypoplasias in Archaeological Skeletal Remains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…LEH are bands of decreased enamel thickness and provide a nearly indelible indicator of stress during tooth crown formation spanning infancy and childhood. These defects are associated with acute forms of stress including infection, inadequate nutrition, and weanling diarrhea (Goodman and Rose, 1991;Schultz et al, 1998). LEH were observed macroscopically and under 103 magnification using a hand-help loupe to help define normal perikymata variations versus hypoplastic enamel (Guatelli-Steinberg, 2003).…”
Section: Subadult Systemic Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEH are bands of decreased enamel thickness and provide a nearly indelible indicator of stress during tooth crown formation spanning infancy and childhood. These defects are associated with acute forms of stress including infection, inadequate nutrition, and weanling diarrhea (Goodman and Rose, 1991;Schultz et al, 1998). LEH were observed macroscopically and under 103 magnification using a hand-help loupe to help define normal perikymata variations versus hypoplastic enamel (Guatelli-Steinberg, 2003).…”
Section: Subadult Systemic Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis in such reviews is the relationship between changing prevalence of LEH and changes in subsistence patterns or differences in socioeconomic or ritual status. Sex differences in LEH prevalance are not usually addressed in these volumes or in recent dental anthropology publications (Hillson, 1996;Schultz et al, 1998). By contrast, Larsen's (1997) ''Bioarchaeology'' briefly summarizes sex differences in prevalence of enamel defects in archaeological skeletal series, and characterizes them as highly variable.…”
Section: Background Sex Differences In Enamel Hypoplasia: a Brief Hismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pit-type, plane-type, and furrow-type [linear enamel hypoplasia, (LEH)] hypoplasia (Berten, 1895;Hillson, 1996). Hypoplasia formation has been related to the intensity and duration of stress events, the number of affected ameloblasts, and their position along the forming tooth crown (Berten, 1895;Hillson and Bond, 1997;Schultz et al, 1998;Fitz-Gerald et al, 2006;Witzel et al, 2006). It has been hypothesized that furrow-type hypoplasia represents a less severe growth disruption than plane-type hypoplasia; however, clear evidence supporting this view is lacking (Hillson, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%