21Recently, a lower than expected number of perikymata between repetitive furrow3type demonstrate that the enamel morphology described by them is not caused by a non3emergence of 30 striae of Retzius but can be attributed to structural variations in outer enamel that result in a 31 differential fracture behavior. While rejecting the presumed existence of non3emergent striae of 32 Retzius, our study provided evidence that, in furrow3type hypoplastic defects, a pronounced 33 tapering of Retzius increments can occur, with the striae of Retzius forming acute angles with the 34 outer enamel surface. We suggest that in such cases the outcrop of some striae of Retzius is 35 essentially unobservable at the enamel surface, causing too low perikymata counts. The 36 pronounced tapering of Retzius increments in outer enamel presumably reflects a mild to 37 moderate disturbance of the function of late secretory ameloblasts. The implications of these 38 findings for the reconstruction of crown growth patterns are discussed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (Boyde, 1989; Hillson, 2014). The outcrops of the long period growth layers at the enamel 46 surface are known as perikymata, with each perikyma consisting of a ridge, exhibiting a rather 47 smooth surface with only very shallow Tomes' process pits, and a groove characterized by deeper
48Tomes' process pits . Typically, a stria of Retzius reaches the outer enamel surface (OES) at the 49 bottom of a perikyma groove (Hillson, 2014). At the cervical margin of each perikyma groove, an 50 increment margin marks the transition to the cervically adjacent perikyma. Thus, the enamel 51 located between two consecutive increment margins at the OES corresponds to a Retzius 52 increment, that is, the stretch of enamel between two consecutive striae of Retzius. In teeth with a 53 known periodicity of the striae of Retzius (= repeat interval in days as evidenced by the number 54 of prism cross striations), crown formation times of lateral (imbricational) enamel can be 55 assessed based on perikymata counts. This approach has been widely used to reconstruct life 56 history traits in extant and fossil hominoids (e.g. Reid et al., 2008; Smith, 2008; Dean, 2010; 57 Hillson 2014) and to determine the timing of developmental stress events in great apes (Skinner 58 and Hopwood, 2004; Guatelli3Steinberg et al., 2012; Skinner and Pruetz, 2012; Skinner 2014).
59In a recent paper, Skinner and Pruetz (2012) reported the occurrence of a lower than 60 expected number of perikymata between repetitive furrow3type hypoplastic enamel defects 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 4 occur between consecutive furrow3t...