1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00896-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantiomer separation of hydrophobic amino compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography using crown ether dynamically coated chiral stationary phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of phase has been commercialized by Daicel (Tokyo, Japan) under the name Chirapack CR(+) and has found application to the chiral separation of amino acids and various primary amines [148,149] and unusual b-alkyl-amino acids [150,151]. One problem with this coated phase is stability.…”
Section: Synthetic Chiral Macrocyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of phase has been commercialized by Daicel (Tokyo, Japan) under the name Chirapack CR(+) and has found application to the chiral separation of amino acids and various primary amines [148,149] and unusual b-alkyl-amino acids [150,151]. One problem with this coated phase is stability.…”
Section: Synthetic Chiral Macrocyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with chiral stationary phase (CSP) has extensively been used to directly separate enantiomers in optical purity test. Enantiomeric amines are usually separated by chiral crown ether columns, [1][2][3][4][5][6] while various racemic amino acids can effectively be separated using CSP chemically immobilized by (1)-18-crown-6 tetracarboxylic acid [(1)-18C6H 4 ; Fig. 1] on silica gel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of the salt concentration in the mobile phase Machida et al (1999) studied the changes in retention of basic substances on dynamically coated crown ether stationary phases and assigned them to the sum of two mechanisms: (a) competition between the analyte and the buffer cation for the entrance inside the crown ether cavity; and (b) ion pair formation between the analyte and the counter anion. When the competition is dominant, retention decreases, whereas when the ion pair formation is dominant, it increases (Machida , 1999).…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%