1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1990.tb00823.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding and storage effects in 7‐year‐olds' and 10‐year‐olds' memory for faces

Abstract: In an attempt to examine children's encoding and storage of faces, two experiments are reported on temporal factors in recognition memory for unfamiliar faces by 7-year-old and 10-year-old children. In Expt 1, viewing durations of 1 and 3 seconds and delay intervals of 0 and 1 week were examined. The younger children were less accurate at immediate test: no difference between the two age groups was evident after a week's interval. Faces presented for 3 s were recognized more accurately than those shown for 1 s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of available research on the identification accuracy of children finds that performance on face recognition tasks typically improves with age (Brewer & Day, 2005;Carey & Diamond, 1977;Ellis & Flin, 1990;Goodman & Reed, 1986;Shapiro & Penrod, 1986). However, a recent review of developmental face recognition concludes that children as young as 5 years of age can process faces as efficiently as adults and presents evidence which strongly suggests that developmental differences in performance may be the result of developmental differences in memory capacities and visual attention (Crookes & McKone, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of available research on the identification accuracy of children finds that performance on face recognition tasks typically improves with age (Brewer & Day, 2005;Carey & Diamond, 1977;Ellis & Flin, 1990;Goodman & Reed, 1986;Shapiro & Penrod, 1986). However, a recent review of developmental face recognition concludes that children as young as 5 years of age can process faces as efficiently as adults and presents evidence which strongly suggests that developmental differences in performance may be the result of developmental differences in memory capacities and visual attention (Crookes & McKone, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face recognition abilities improve through childhood (e.g. Blaney & Winograd, 1978;Ellis & Flin, 1990;List, 1986). This improvement may follow a linear pattern (Feinman & Entwisle, 1976;Hills, 2014) and is associated with better memory for faces in children (Dempster, 1981;Hills 2012) and faster responding (Johnston & Ellis, 1995).…”
Section: Development Of Face-spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carey and colleagues (Carey, Diamond, & Woods, 1980) have studied systematically the developmental changes in children's facial memory and have found that 6-to 16-year-old children perform worse than adults. Moreover, children's memory for faces is more sensitive than adults' to facial expression, facial perspective, clothing, or hairstyle (Carey & Diamond, 1977;Ellis & Flin, 1990;Ellis, 1992). Carey (1992) has proposed that, unlike adults, children cannot abstract the invariant details of faces nor distinguish distinct features in faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%