2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2016.7576768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-of-line fault detection for combustion engines using one-class classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Devices that pass the quality test are considered as devices with correct functions (see Figure 9). The decision on the state of product after a quality test was performed and was previously left to the experience of domain experts [85]. However, with the introduction of mass customization, shorter product life cycles and digital supply chains, this approach has reached its limits, and the need for new approaches has become clear.…”
Section: Predictive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices that pass the quality test are considered as devices with correct functions (see Figure 9). The decision on the state of product after a quality test was performed and was previously left to the experience of domain experts [85]. However, with the introduction of mass customization, shorter product life cycles and digital supply chains, this approach has reached its limits, and the need for new approaches has become clear.…”
Section: Predictive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ensemble of these one-class classifiers can be used for fault classification (Carino, et al, 2018), so that each type of fault will be classified by its model. Using one-class support vector machines (SVM) is common (Khan & Madden, 2014) and can be used with hand-crafted features in an end-of-line test (Leitner, Lagrange, & Endisch, 2016). But also a reduction of the raw data can be used as input (Fernández-Francos, Martı ńez-Rego, Fontenla-Romero, & Alonso-Betanzos, 2013).…”
Section: One-class-classifier For Anomaly Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%