2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-to-end navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle with Hybrid Recurrent Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, when monitoring attributes and hydrological factors are combined as system inputs, the prediction result reaches the best. To verify the advantages of the constructed model, we compare it with multiple traditional regression models, including Linear Regression (LR), Robust Linear Regression (RLR), Interaction Linear Regression (IR), Pure Quadratic Regression (PQR) and Fine Tree Regression (FTR) (Yang, 2018;Goebel and Plötz, 2019;Acharya et al, 2019), BPNN (Back Propagation Neural Network) and DBPNN (BPNN with two hidden layers), and some common RNN networks, including general RNN, Bidirectional RNN (BRNN) and Deep RNN (DRNN) (Cui et al, 2018;Mu et al, 2019). In the comparison experiments, we select 10 feature variables as inputs of models and use the same training (12416 data records) and testing data (3105 data records).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, when monitoring attributes and hydrological factors are combined as system inputs, the prediction result reaches the best. To verify the advantages of the constructed model, we compare it with multiple traditional regression models, including Linear Regression (LR), Robust Linear Regression (RLR), Interaction Linear Regression (IR), Pure Quadratic Regression (PQR) and Fine Tree Regression (FTR) (Yang, 2018;Goebel and Plötz, 2019;Acharya et al, 2019), BPNN (Back Propagation Neural Network) and DBPNN (BPNN with two hidden layers), and some common RNN networks, including general RNN, Bidirectional RNN (BRNN) and Deep RNN (DRNN) (Cui et al, 2018;Mu et al, 2019). In the comparison experiments, we select 10 feature variables as inputs of models and use the same training (12416 data records) and testing data (3105 data records).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely used in data processing and modelling in water transport Lin et al (2019). proposed a RNN with convolution for online obstacle avoidance in unmanned underwater vehicles Mu et al (2019). proposed Hybrid RNNs that use unidirectional and bi-directional LSTMs to handle different sensor data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not mention the training time requirement, processing load, and the total number of neurons used in the network. Another current study proposed an end-to-end navigation solution based on deep hybrid recurrent neural networks and used raw sensors data directly to estimate the location underwater vehicle [24]. An investigation that was conducted recently took advantage of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and incorporated the deep deterministic policy gradient for tuning the process noise covariance matrix online from low-cost navigational sensors [25].…”
Section: Review Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we employed a hybrid recurrent neural networks (RNNs) framework to realize AUV position estimation. Since the training process uses the GPS movement as the label, and the raw data of the sensors as the input, the trained framework could include the interference from yaw error [ 32 ]. Figure 3 presents the structure of hybrid RNNs.…”
Section: Adaptive Navigation Algorithm With Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the neural network method could approach the optimal solution, this method could effectively improve the navigation accuracy when the sensor has a large deviation. However, according to our research, the positioning accuracy of the neural network method is unsatisfactory compared to that of the traditional navigation method when the sensor accuracy is high [ 32 ]. Additionally, the navigation information frequency of the deep learning method is low since the calculation cycle of the deep learning method needs data from a duration time, which would cause this method to be insufficient in some missions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%