2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endolysosomal protease susceptibility of Amb a 1 as a determinant of allergenicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This feature may influence allergen processing and, in turn, determine allergenicity through increasing the intensity and polarization of TH2 responses. 6,7 Our results showed that the shortening of Blo t 5 led to a reduced susceptibility to endolysosomal proteolysis ( Figure 1E). We hypothesize that the absence of the disordered N-terminal region in rBlo t 5 short has reduced the flexibility of the molecule and, in association with the higher temporal folding capacity, the profile of endolysosomal degradation was then modified.…”
Section: N-terminal Peptide Deletion Influences Immunological and Strmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This feature may influence allergen processing and, in turn, determine allergenicity through increasing the intensity and polarization of TH2 responses. 6,7 Our results showed that the shortening of Blo t 5 led to a reduced susceptibility to endolysosomal proteolysis ( Figure 1E). We hypothesize that the absence of the disordered N-terminal region in rBlo t 5 short has reduced the flexibility of the molecule and, in association with the higher temporal folding capacity, the profile of endolysosomal degradation was then modified.…”
Section: N-terminal Peptide Deletion Influences Immunological and Strmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, the allergenic potential of a protein often cannot be rationalized, nor predicted, based on sequence or structural similarity to known allergens (Lu et al, 2018). However, one decisive feature biasing the immunologic response to a protein antigen is its proteolytic susceptibility (Toda et al, 2011;Apostolovic et al, 2016;Machado et al, 2016;Scheiblhofer et al, 2017;Wolf et al, 2018). Hence, reliable experimental and computational models of proteolytic susceptibility in the endosome represent promising tools to understand, and possibly even predict, what makes a protein an allergen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recognition of this MHC2-peptide complex by Thelper cells then determines the subsequent immune response (Watts, 2004;Valenta et al, 2010). Thus, proteolytic cleavage of the exogenous antigen is a crucial step in this mechanism and is discussed as the origin of the varying allergenic potential of the studied Bet v 1 variants (Thai et al, 2004;Machado et al, 2016;Wolf et al, 2018). Only antigens with an "optimal" stability are able to induce an allergic response on T-cell level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, if the same proteins are applied within their natural “matrix,” that is within an aqueous pollen extract, allergic sensitization results even in the absence of external adjuvants such as alum. Recently, however, a highly immunogenic Amb a 1 isoform was described to potently sensitize mice in the absence of adjuvant, presumably due to its stability to endolysosomal degradation in dendritic cells …”
Section: Matrix Matters: Lessons To Be Learned From Pollenmentioning
confidence: 99%