2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic duodenal stent versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Duodenal stent placement is minimally invasive and associated with favorable short-term results, such as fast relief of symptoms and improvement in food intake. However, a significant risk of late adverse events (AEs) was found, such as stent migration and recurrent obstruction, often necessitating reintervention 3 4 5 6 7 . SGJ provides longer-lasting patency with less need for reinterventions once the anastomosis is functioning and patients have recovered 3 8 9 10 , but it is a more invasive treatment and associated with surgery-related morbidity such as gastroparesis or intestinal paralysis 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duodenal stent placement is minimally invasive and associated with favorable short-term results, such as fast relief of symptoms and improvement in food intake. However, a significant risk of late adverse events (AEs) was found, such as stent migration and recurrent obstruction, often necessitating reintervention 3 4 5 6 7 . SGJ provides longer-lasting patency with less need for reinterventions once the anastomosis is functioning and patients have recovered 3 8 9 10 , but it is a more invasive treatment and associated with surgery-related morbidity such as gastroparesis or intestinal paralysis 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses comparing extrahepatic and intrahepatic access routes for EUS-BD fund similar technical and functional success rates in both routes but adverse events were less frequent with the extrahepatic route in one analysis (32,41,42). In essence the choice of access route is dependent on the factors of patient's anatomy, local expertise and personal preference (42,43). When it comes to choice of stents for EUS-BD the aim is to establish a tight connection between the gastrointestinal and the biliary tract to avoid biliary leakage and peritonitis.…”
Section: Endosonographic Biliary Drainage (Eus-bd)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Duodenal or gastric outlet obstruction is common in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and the most established therapeutic options for this problem are operative gastroenterostomy and the implantation of an endoluminal gastroduodenal SEMS (GDS) ( Figure 1C). Retrospective comparative studies quite homogeneously showed a shorter in hospitalization without significant differences in complications, reinterventions and survival between the groups (42,56,57), with higher score of patency for the surgical patients in the early follow up, but similar rates in the later follow up and earlier oral food intake and shorter time to chemotherapy in the GDS groups (42,57). The complications and risks of GDS include stent migration and blockage from food, debris or tumor ingrowth, as well as bleeding, perforation and blocking the ampulla, possibly causing pancreatitis or cholangitis.…”
Section: Gastroduodenal Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Symptom recurrence is attributed to tumor ingrowth and stent migration[ 31 ]. Despite recurrence, additional duodenal stent placement has been shown to be feasible and effective[ 31 , 32 ]. Stent design continues to advance and covered stents were designed to mitigate tumor ingrowth, but were found to have a high rate of migration[ 33 ].…”
Section: Duodenal Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%