1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(90)71136-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic removal of toothbrushes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all 50 ingestion cases, 19 were due to an attempt to provoke vomiting. Of these cases, 10 were associated with patients who had been diagnosed with bulimia [17][18][19][20][21], five occurred while brushing the teeth [22][23][24][25][26] and four occurred while brushing the back part of the tongue or pharynx [16,[27][28][29]. There was one case report [30] in which the toothbrush was swallowed as an effort to remove a foreign body, one case in which the subject ingested the toothbrush in an attempt to commit suicide [31] and another case of ingestion that led to death [7].…”
Section: Search and Selection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all 50 ingestion cases, 19 were due to an attempt to provoke vomiting. Of these cases, 10 were associated with patients who had been diagnosed with bulimia [17][18][19][20][21], five occurred while brushing the teeth [22][23][24][25][26] and four occurred while brushing the back part of the tongue or pharynx [16,[27][28][29]. There was one case report [30] in which the toothbrush was swallowed as an effort to remove a foreign body, one case in which the subject ingested the toothbrush in an attempt to commit suicide [31] and another case of ingestion that led to death [7].…”
Section: Search and Selection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire apparatus (ie, foreign body, overtube, and endoscope) can then be withdrawn in 1 motion to avoid losing grasp of the object within the overtube. 67 Sharp-pointed objects. A myriad of ingested sharppointed objects have been described.…”
Section: True Foreign Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign bodies longer than 10 cm, such as a toothbrush, cannot negotiate the duodenal C-loop due to its fixed retroperitoneal position [2]. These objects should be endoscopically removed as soon as possible to avoid pressure necrosis and gastrointestinal perforation [5, 6, 7]. If endoscopic removal fails or there is evidence of obstruction or perforation, laparoscopic gastrotomy should be performed [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%