2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic resection and ablation versus esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer has lower morbidity than an esophagectomy and similar survival during short-term follow-up, but required multiple procedures in most patients. Both therapies are appropriate options, but preservation of the esophagus allows the option of a fundoplication for reflux control, perhaps further improving long-term quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite significant investment and advances in the treatment method of cancer, the overall survival for advanced and metastatic cancer is still poor [47,48]. Hence, further investigation in early diagnosis of cancer is required with focus on microRNAs as potential biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant investment and advances in the treatment method of cancer, the overall survival for advanced and metastatic cancer is still poor [47,48]. Hence, further investigation in early diagnosis of cancer is required with focus on microRNAs as potential biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E ndoscopic therapy has recently become an accepted first-line treatment for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal cancer (IMC) [1]. Two randomized controlled trials [2,3] and multiple case series [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have demonstrated low morbidity, low rates of progression to esophageal cancer, and high rates of successful disease eradication with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), or both. However, little is known about the outcomes of patients in whom the dysplastic cells persist, those in whom there is recurrence of the dysplasia, or those in whom there is progression from dysplasia to cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 There are no prospective trials comparing outcomes of endoscopic therapy (resection and/or ablation) with surgical therapy (esophagectomy) for BE with HGD, although a number of retrospective trials have been conducted. 50,82,83 Put together, these experiences did not demonstrate a survival difference for either surgery or ablation with or without resection, although early mortality was higher in the surgical group. There was significant treatment failure observed in the endotherapy groups as 6-20% of patients developed new or metachronous cancer.…”
Section: Management Of Be With Lgdmentioning
confidence: 70%