1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a comparison between strip biopsy and aspiration lumpectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoscopic resection of carcinoid tumors with polypectomy or strip biopsy with grasping forceps is sometimes associated with margin involvement and crush injury of the resected specimens, which leads to difficulty in pathological evaluation and often necessitates additional surgical intervention [16][17][18]. With aspiration lumpectomy and mucosal resection using a ligation device, tumors can be frontally viewed with a hood attached to the endoscope and lifted sufficiently by endoscopic suction [19][20][21][22][23]. In this way, undamaged circular resected specimens can be obtained, resulting in a high complete resection rate for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum but not for tumors located in the upper rectum [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic resection of carcinoid tumors with polypectomy or strip biopsy with grasping forceps is sometimes associated with margin involvement and crush injury of the resected specimens, which leads to difficulty in pathological evaluation and often necessitates additional surgical intervention [16][17][18]. With aspiration lumpectomy and mucosal resection using a ligation device, tumors can be frontally viewed with a hood attached to the endoscope and lifted sufficiently by endoscopic suction [19][20][21][22][23]. In this way, undamaged circular resected specimens can be obtained, resulting in a high complete resection rate for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum but not for tumors located in the upper rectum [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various endoscopic treatments for rectal carcinoid tumors have been described including endoscopic polypectomy, strip biopsy, aspiration lumpectomy, and mucosal resection using a ligation device [4,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Kobayashi et al [17] reported that the degree of submucosal invasion evaluated by EUS was useful for selection of the treatment technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the tumors can be elevated with the grasping forceps, endoscopic polypectomy using a twochannel colonoscope often results in crush injury of resected specimens [18]. With aspiration lumpectomy and mucosal resection using a ligation device, the tumors can be viewed frontally with a hood attached to the endoscope and lifted sufficiently by endoscopic suction [19][20][21][22][23]. In this way, undamaged circular resected specimens can be obtained, and the complete resection rate is high for carcinoid tumors in the lower portion of the rectum but not for tumors located in the upper portion of the rectum [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disease entities include various benign cystic lesions such as retention cyst, submucosal glandular cyst, bronchogenic cyst, and duplication cyst, among others [34,35]. These cystic lesions are commonly identified as well-demarcated, anechoic, rounded or ovoid, compressible structures on EUS.…”
Section: Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Versus Other Gastric Submucosal Tmentioning
confidence: 99%