2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06866-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic versus laparoscopic drainage of pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis following acute pancreatitis: a randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larg and colleagues compared surgical versus endoscopic cystgastrostomy and necrosectomy. The success rate was 93.3% and 90% in the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively (25). Overall, the cost, length of hospital stay, and invasiveness is higher with the surgical approach when compared to an endoscopic approach (26).…”
Section: Procedural Considerations For Drainagementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Larg and colleagues compared surgical versus endoscopic cystgastrostomy and necrosectomy. The success rate was 93.3% and 90% in the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups, respectively (25). Overall, the cost, length of hospital stay, and invasiveness is higher with the surgical approach when compared to an endoscopic approach (26).…”
Section: Procedural Considerations For Drainagementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed the superior technical success of EUS-guided drainage over conventional endoscopic drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts with similar clinical success and complications. [7][8][9][17][18][19] Preprocedure imaging assesses the maturity of cyst wall, proximity to gut lumen, size of the cyst, necrotic contents within the cyst, presence of pseudoaneurysms, and pancreatic ductal disruption. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is performed for assessing a PFC.…”
Section: Statement 4 Eus-guided Access Is Preferred Over Conventional Endoscopic-guided Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 references were full text screened and of these 3 were excluded as one reference presented the trial registry of a non-randomized trial and one reference presented the trial registry of an ongoing trial [24], while one randomized trial identified by hand search presented a trial that excluded patients with > 30% necrotic debris in the walled-off necrosis. Furthermore, 18.3% of the patients in the trial were patients with pseudocysts and the patients with walled-off necrosis had sterile walled-off necrosis [25]. The remaining 14 references were all related to the three included studies (trial registry [26][27][28], congress abstracts or comments [29,34], protocols [35,36], final publications [37][38][39]).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%