1993
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovaginal Scanning of the Endometrium Compared to Cytology and Histology in Women with Postmenopausal Bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9,25,34,38 -45 Seven studies were limited to postmenopausal women. 9,13,14,21,24,26,41 All other studies either reported on both premenopausal and postmenopausal women or did not report on the menopausal status of the included patients. One study reported on asymptomatic women only, 38 and 14 studies reported on symptomatic women only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,25,34,38 -45 Seven studies were limited to postmenopausal women. 9,13,14,21,24,26,41 All other studies either reported on both premenopausal and postmenopausal women or did not report on the menopausal status of the included patients. One study reported on asymptomatic women only, 38 and 14 studies reported on symptomatic women only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Nevertheless, since vaginal bleeding is a common symptom among postmenopausal women, ultrasound has been a useful screening method for determining which symptomatic patients should undergo invasive collection of endometrial samples. In this situation, endometrial thickening, as measured by ultrasonography, correlates better with the presence of endometrial lesions [9][10][11] than among asymptomatic women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Transvaginal ultrasonography is a simple, non-invasive imaging method used for the evaluation of anatomic abnormalities which may cause AUB [2,18]. However, there is no consensus on the cut-off value for endometrial thickness [2,7,19,20 ]. Gull B et al reported that in cases with endometrial thickness <4mm endometrial carcinoma was not associated and his findings coincided with other studies in the literature [2,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, there is no consensus on the cut-off value for endometrial thickness [2,7,19,20 ]. Gull B et al reported that in cases with endometrial thickness <4mm endometrial carcinoma was not associated and his findings coincided with other studies in the literature [2,[19][20][21][22]. However, Buyuk E reported cutoff of 6 mm for endometrial thickness [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation