2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1190-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular coil embolization of middle cerebral artery aneurysms of the proximal (M1) segment

Abstract: Coil embolization in M1 aneurysms seems to be safe and efficacious, although it may require various technical strategies due to distinct anatomic configurations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in protective devices and coiling techniques, including balloon remodeling and stent protection have rendered many previously ineligible aneurysms with difficult configurations amenable to selective endovascular treatment ( 16 ). However, angio-anatomic complexities, including extreme vessel tortuosity or intricate vascular arrangements occasionally prohibit using these techniques ( 17 ). Dual microcatheter coil embolization, pioneered by Baxter et al ( 10 ), may be a viable alternate technical strategy for challenging wide-neck intracranial aneurysms ( 11 12 18 19 ), although two microcatheters are occasionally insufficient to form a stable coil frame without protrusion or to protect the parent artery from impingement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in protective devices and coiling techniques, including balloon remodeling and stent protection have rendered many previously ineligible aneurysms with difficult configurations amenable to selective endovascular treatment ( 16 ). However, angio-anatomic complexities, including extreme vessel tortuosity or intricate vascular arrangements occasionally prohibit using these techniques ( 17 ). Dual microcatheter coil embolization, pioneered by Baxter et al ( 10 ), may be a viable alternate technical strategy for challenging wide-neck intracranial aneurysms ( 11 12 18 19 ), although two microcatheters are occasionally insufficient to form a stable coil frame without protrusion or to protect the parent artery from impingement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 As endovascular treatment strategies continue to evolve, reports are increasing about the treatment of ruptured MCA aneurysms with endovascular strategies. 4,6,9,10,12,14,16,17,27 In the largest series in the endovascular literature to date, Mortimer et al 14 Although some selection bias might be present in their series, Mortimer et al 14 noted that they practice a "coilfirst" policy at their institution and that only 51 patients with ruptured MCA aneurysms were treated with primary clipping during roughly the same period. Twenty-one of these patients were noted to have poor anatomy for endovascular treatment or had already undergone an unsuccessful attempt at coiling, whereas the remainder of those who underwent clipping did so because of surgeon preference or the lack of availability of an interventional neuroradiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors in microcatheter selection of intracranial aneurysms (including paraclinoid aneurysms) is a properly configured distal tip, either pre-shaped or steam-shaped ( 12 18 19 ). As shown in Table 2 , consistencies in microcatheter shape are evident, depending on how a dome of aneurysm is directed (relative to carotid siphon).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%