2021
DOI: 10.1186/s42155-021-00256-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular recanalization of chronic total occlusions of the native superficial femoral artery after failed femoropopliteal bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia

Abstract: Background Femoropopliteal bypass occlusions are a significant issue in patients with critical limb ischemia and chronic total occlusion of the native superficial femoral artery, which challenges vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. Performing a secondary femoropopliteal bypass is still considered the standard of care, although it is associated with a higher complication rate and lower patency rate in comparison with primary bypass. Over the past few years, angioplasty has been co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to both the CTCAE and the CIRSE classification systems, patients experienced a global rate of adverse events after chemoembolization that is comparable to previous data on cTACE, DSM-TACE, or DEB-TACE, performed with conventional femoral or radial accesses [19,20,39,[54][55][56], and on other procedures in the endovascular fields [57][58][59]. Finally, in our investigation, we did not observe significant differences in terms of safety endpoints between the group undergoing DEB-TACE with femoral access and the group undergoing DEB-TACE with distal radial access.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to both the CTCAE and the CIRSE classification systems, patients experienced a global rate of adverse events after chemoembolization that is comparable to previous data on cTACE, DSM-TACE, or DEB-TACE, performed with conventional femoral or radial accesses [19,20,39,[54][55][56], and on other procedures in the endovascular fields [57][58][59]. Finally, in our investigation, we did not observe significant differences in terms of safety endpoints between the group undergoing DEB-TACE with femoral access and the group undergoing DEB-TACE with distal radial access.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The rate of vascular access site complications (VASCs) was comparable to other published studies in the endovascular field, whether it is femoral or radial access [35,40,41,44,[48][49][50]. Two cases of access site hematoma in high-risk patients with a platelet count lower than 100,000 per microliter of blood were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…35 Possibly, a complex interventional procedure such as CART and SAFARI can be performed in those cases where the simple retrograde approach is not sufficient to treat the target lesion. 13,37 Despite these advantages and the growing evidence and indications in support of endovascular treatment also for complex femoro-popliteal TASC C or D lesions, 6,7,38,39 limited data are currently available to evaluate the retrograde crossing of femoropopliteal occlusions with tibial access. Other options as retrograde vascular access sites include the distal SFA, popliteal and pedal artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advantages and the growing evidence and indications in support of endovascular treatment also for complex femoro‐popliteal TASC C or D lesions, 6,7,38,39 limited data are currently available to evaluate the retrograde crossing of femoro‐popliteal occlusions with tibial access. Other options as retrograde vascular access sites include the distal SFA, popliteal and pedal artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides easy antegrade access to the ipsilateral lower extremity and retrograde access to the remaining arterial tree, thus enabling numerous endovascular procedures aimed at restoring vessel caliber, removing a thrombus, occluding a vessel, retrieving foreign bodies, or delivering drugs or medical devices. Arterial introducer sheaths ranging in size from 4 to 8 Fr are used in most interventional radiology procedures [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. After the removal of the introducer sheath, achieving hemostasis of the vascular access site by manual compression (MC) or a vascular closure device (VCD) is critical to the safe completion of any endovascular procedure [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%