2018
DOI: 10.9739/tjvs.2018.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovenous ablation technique using N-butyl cyanoacrylate in varicose veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year DUS examination, the occlusion rates were around 99%, and the reflux rates were below 1% in the study, and it objectively demonstrates the effectiveness of CAE. On the other hand, Senol et al [25] found the 3-month closure rate to be 97.6% in a similar study. The change of symptoms in patients after the treatment is evaluated subjectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year DUS examination, the occlusion rates were around 99%, and the reflux rates were below 1% in the study, and it objectively demonstrates the effectiveness of CAE. On the other hand, Senol et al [25] found the 3-month closure rate to be 97.6% in a similar study. The change of symptoms in patients after the treatment is evaluated subjectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The mean procedural times in previous studies were 21, 18.6, 24, and 13.3 min, respectively. [15][16][17][18] However, the duration of procedure requires more specific definition. The reported procedural time in a study was 5.4±2.5 min, [19] indicating that some patients received NBCA treatment within <3 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted on chemical ablation with NBCA have reported successful results, similar to thermal ablation and conventional surgery. 8,9 We aimed to evaluate the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and NBCA interventional techniques by comparing them in terms of their benefit, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%