1998
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-998-0140-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endpoint detection for CMP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…113 Introduction of these or other new materials will require new slurries as well as reoptimization of the entire process recipe. For example, these new materials complicate the P5038 ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 4 (11) P5029-P5039 (2015) end point detection methodology, 114 especially if the optical properties of the materials or the coefficient of friction are very different. Also, for materials such as silicon oxynitride used with an underlying silicon nitride stop layer, the difference in optical properties may not be sufficiently large for the optical method to identify the end point.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…113 Introduction of these or other new materials will require new slurries as well as reoptimization of the entire process recipe. For example, these new materials complicate the P5038 ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 4 (11) P5029-P5039 (2015) end point detection methodology, 114 especially if the optical properties of the materials or the coefficient of friction are very different. Also, for materials such as silicon oxynitride used with an underlying silicon nitride stop layer, the difference in optical properties may not be sufficiently large for the optical method to identify the end point.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They fall into categories such as thermal, torque motor current, chemical, electrical or electrochemical, optical, and vibration. For an earlier review on endpoint detection for CMP see Bibby, et al 2 For reference, we have summarized list of relevant U.S. patents on in-line monitoring techniques for CMP given in Table 1 at the end of this section.…”
Section: Monitoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the nature of the ILD oxide, there is no stopping layer and hence lacks an effective endpoint detection technology at CMP. It has been historically considered a "blind" CMP process, presenting tremendous challenges to achieving across wafer uniformity and defect control [2]. With semiconductor process technology advances to even smaller geometry, the within wafer nonuniformity issue of ILD oxide CMP, especially at the very edge of a wafer, becomes a top device yield killer for high volume IC manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With semiconductor process technology advances to even smaller geometry, the within wafer nonuniformity issue of ILD oxide CMP, especially at the very edge of a wafer, becomes a top device yield killer for high volume IC manufacturing. Advanced process control technologies and hardware, such as in-situ polishing pressure control using multi-zone polishing heads and optical endpoint systems, have been developed for ILD oxide CMP process control for 0.09 µm technology and beyond [2]. However, current transistor number multiplication and geometry miniaturization to enable higher density and higher speed devices have outpaced semiconductor hardware advancements and breakthroughs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%