2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetic cost of learning and memory can cause cognitive impairment in honeybees

Abstract: The energetic cost of cognitive functions can lead to either impairments in learning and memory, or to trade-offs with other functions, when the amount of available energy is limited. However, it has been suggested that, under such conditions, social groups such as honeybees might be able to ward off cognitive impairments in individual bees by adjusting resource allocation at the colony level. Using two complementary experiments, one that tests the effect of learning on subsequent energetic state and survival,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also interesting that the longer duration spent on a foraging trip does not translate to a higher foraging return for infected bees, which could result from a reduced ability in locating quality resources. The likely factors underlying this reduction are the longer time spent by such bees in orientation and flight [4,5,7] and the learning impairment seen in both infected [16] and energetically stressed bees [11], even more reinforced by the fact that any precocious foraging by infected bees [6] would have alleviated such reductions. If the foraging trips for infected bees are longer but their returns are lower, what does it mean for the two foraging currencies?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting that the longer duration spent on a foraging trip does not translate to a higher foraging return for infected bees, which could result from a reduced ability in locating quality resources. The likely factors underlying this reduction are the longer time spent by such bees in orientation and flight [4,5,7] and the learning impairment seen in both infected [16] and energetically stressed bees [11], even more reinforced by the fact that any precocious foraging by infected bees [6] would have alleviated such reductions. If the foraging trips for infected bees are longer but their returns are lower, what does it mean for the two foraging currencies?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, learning is expected to increase the fitness of insects that evolved such abilities. However, like any biological process, learning requires energy [37-39 and see Box 2] and is subjected to trade-offs with other functions [40-41]. In the end, the capacity for learning would be selected for if evolutionary benefits exceed costs [42].…”
Section: Epidemiological Consequences Of Vector Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cognitive impairment could also explain the increase in flight duration. However, the energetic and cognitive hypotheses are not mutually exclusive as learning and memory have an energetic cost for bees (Jaumann et al, 2013). Therefore, an energetic stress caused by the parasite would add costs to both orientation and locomotion in the field (Jaumann et al, 2013), leading to a significant increase in flight duration.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%