2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and exergy analysis of vapor compression–triple effect absorption cascade refrigeration system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cimsit et al (Cimsit, 2018) made a thermodynamic analysis on a double-effect absorption compression cascade refrigeration and suggested that the components with high exergy destruction rates should be paid more attentions. Agarwal et al (Agarwal et al, 2020) investigated the influences of critical operating parameters of a triple-effect absorption cascade refrigeration on COP, exergy efficiency, exergy destruction rate, and exergy destruction ratio, and found that the system's refrigeration coefficient and exergy efficiency were higher than the single effect and double effect absorption-compression cascade refrigeration system. Faruque et al (Faruque et al, 2022) detailed a thermodynamic analysis of a triple effect cascade refrigeration system in ultra-low temperature application, and found that the highest COP and exergy efficiency was 0.5931% and 54.5% respectively when evaporating temperature was −100 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cimsit et al (Cimsit, 2018) made a thermodynamic analysis on a double-effect absorption compression cascade refrigeration and suggested that the components with high exergy destruction rates should be paid more attentions. Agarwal et al (Agarwal et al, 2020) investigated the influences of critical operating parameters of a triple-effect absorption cascade refrigeration on COP, exergy efficiency, exergy destruction rate, and exergy destruction ratio, and found that the system's refrigeration coefficient and exergy efficiency were higher than the single effect and double effect absorption-compression cascade refrigeration system. Faruque et al (Faruque et al, 2022) detailed a thermodynamic analysis of a triple effect cascade refrigeration system in ultra-low temperature application, and found that the highest COP and exergy efficiency was 0.5931% and 54.5% respectively when evaporating temperature was −100 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that a COP enhancement of more than 200%, corresponding to evaporator and condenser temperatures of 6 C and 40 C respectively. Performance of triple effect compressor-absorption system was examined by Agarwal et al 21 The results of the analysis indicate that higher COP was attained in the triple effect hybrid cycle when compared to double effect hybrid cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of triple effect compressor-absorption system was examined by Agarwal et al. 21 The results of the analysis indicate that higher COP was attained in the triple effect hybrid cycle when compared to double effect hybrid cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrated system, which combines a VCRS with a VARS, merges the advantages of both standalone systems, resulting in a cost-effective refrigeration system [ 20 , 21 ]. In a combined VCR-VAR system—CVCARS—the electrical power required in VCRS and the heat energy required in VARS can be significantly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many publications addressing exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of combined VCR–VAR systems that use different mixtures for the absorption cycle (e.g., H 2 O-LiBr and NH 3 -H 2 O) and different working fluids for the compression cycle (e.g., R22, R134a, R717, and R1234yf) [ 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Agarwal et al [ 20 ] analyzed an absorption-compression cascade refrigeration system (ACCRS) by combining a series flow triple-effect H 2 O-LiBr VARS with a single VCRS operated with R1234yf. High-pressure generator, evaporator, and absorber temperature values ranging between 448.15 and 473.15 K, 223.15 and 263.15 K, and 298.15–313.15 K, respectively, were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%