Energy autonomy in residential buildings: A techno-economic model-based analysis of the scale effects

Abstract

An increasingly decentralized energy supply structure alongside economic incentives for increasing the level of self-generation and -consumption are encouraging (higher levels of) energy autonomy. Previous work in this area has focused on the technical and economic aspects of energy autonomy at distinct scales, from individual buildings, through neighbourhoods to districts. This paper employs a mixed integer linear program (MILP) to assess the effects of aggregation across these scales on the economics of energy autonomy in residential buildings. The model minimizes total energy system costs over the lifetime of the energy system, including micro-CHP, PV, thermal and electrical storage, and boilers, at five distinct scales and for nine demand cases. It is subject to several constraints, amongst other things the degree of electrical self-sufficiency. The results indicate a shift in the economically optimal level of electrical self-sufficiency with scale, which in Single Family Households (SFHs) means from around 30% at the individual building level to almost 100% in districts of 1000 SFH households. Above around 560 households it could be economically advantageous to make a district of residential buildings electrically self-sufficient. In addition, a marginal increase in electrical self-sufficiency is significantly more expensive at lower aggregation scales (i.e. single buildings) compared to the scale of neighbourhoods and districts. The level of interaction with the electrical distribution network increases with increasing electrical self-sufficiency before then decreasing at very high (above 70%) levels. Future work should focus on a richer socioeconomic differentiation, considering other sectors and technologies, incorporating demand side options and analysing the effects on the overarching energy system. AbstractAn increasingly decentralized energy supply structure alongside economic incentives for increasing the level of self-generation and -consumption are encouraging (higher levels of) energy autonomy. Previous work in this area has focused on the technical and economic aspects of energy autonomy at distinct scales, from individual buildings, through neighbourhoods to districts. This paper employs a mixed integer linear program (MILP) to assess the effects of aggregation across these scales on the economics of energy autonomy in residential buildings. The model minimizes total energy system costs over the lifetime of the energy system, including micro-CHP, PV, thermal and electrical storage, and boilers, at five distinct scales and for nine demand cases. It is subject to several constraints, amongst other things the degree of electrical self-sufficiency. The results indicate a shift in the economically optimal level of electrical self-sufficiency with scale, which in Single Family Households (SFHs) means from around 30% at the individual building level to almost 100% in districts of 1000 SFH households. Above around 560 households it could be economically advantageous to make a district of residential b...

Organizing prosumers into electricity trading communities: Costs to attain electricity transfer limitations and self‐sufficiency goals

“…Community electricity generation and storage systems could consist of one larger installation paid for and utilized by the whole energy community rather than several distributed installations as assumed in this work. Including economies of scale for investments in community‐size, as compared to household‐size, items of equipment is of particular relevance if thermal generation, as exemplified by local combined heat and power plants, is included in the analysis, potentially making electricity self‐sufficiency more beneficial for larger aggregations of residential households, as compared to individual households …”

“…To provide frameworks and trajectories with the goal of establishing a more active role for electricity users in the energy system, a better understanding is needed as to what functions self‐consumption and the aggregation of electricity consumers on different scales will have in a future electricity system. Research has been conducted on the topics of energy autarky and self‐consumption on different scales, from individual buildings to neighborhoods and districts, as well as on the clustering of prosumers to optimize power grid operation and reduce costs . Community energy storage has been investigated in terms of economic benefits and possibilities to integrate renewable energy sources and demand‐side management .…”

Analysing socioeconomic diversity and scaling effects on residential electricity load profiles in the context of low carbon technology uptake

“…Other than to mention that the economic optimization does not necessarily determine the most environmentally optimum configuration, other related weaknesses are not included here. Instead the reader is referred to Merkel et al (2015) and McKenna et al (2016), in which they are discussed at length.…”

“…Most of these studies employ optimisation and/or simulation approaches that depict the building's physical and thermal characteristics in detail yet do not differentiate between (types of) households. For a detailed discussion the reader is referred to McKenna et al (2016).…”

Thermodynamic analysis on the part-load performance of a microturbine system for micro/mini-CHP applications

“…A systematic review on the cost of CHP system for Europe, Asia, and the USA has been reported by Staffell et al The study concludes that a long-term target of $300-5000 for 1-2 kW fuel cell micro-CHP system is more realistic and attainable by 2020 [ total turb turbine sys system energy autonomy in residential buildings. A mixed integer linear program is utilized to minimize the system cost over the lifetime of various energy production systems such as micro-CHP, photovoltaic (PV), thermal and electrical storage, and boilers, at five distinct scales and for nine demand cases [22].…”