2002
DOI: 10.5253/arde.v64.p117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Balance and Optimal Foraging Strategies in Shorebirds: Some Implications for Their Distributions and Movements in the Non-Breeding Season

Abstract: CONTENTS I. Introduction. 2. Factors which increase the daily energy requirements 3. Factors which reduceihe rate offood intake. .. 4. Factors which reduce the availability of prey 5. Factors which reduce potential feeding time '.'. . 6. The influence of physical factors on energy balance. 7. Optimal foraging strategies in shorebirds-some energetic considerations 8. The distribution of shorebirds inthe non-breeding season 9. Summary. .. . 10. Acknowledgements II. References .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy intake can compensate for the energy expended in thermogenesis, essential for survival (Evans, 1976;Reinecke et al, 1982;Hegemann et al, 2012). We found that the body mass of Chinese Bulbuls was highest in spring and winter and that this was paralleled by changes in GEI and DEI (Table 1; Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Effect Of Seasonal Acclimatization On Energy Intake and Digementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Energy intake can compensate for the energy expended in thermogenesis, essential for survival (Evans, 1976;Reinecke et al, 1982;Hegemann et al, 2012). We found that the body mass of Chinese Bulbuls was highest in spring and winter and that this was paralleled by changes in GEI and DEI (Table 1; Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Effect Of Seasonal Acclimatization On Energy Intake and Digementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Intertidal systems are characterized by their elevation and their inundation time (Evans, 2002), which influence the biomass and species richness of suitable prey (Beukema, 1976; Waser et al., 2016; Yates et al., 1993). Prey depletion close to the breeding colony may be counteracted by a habitat switch (Schwemmer & Garthe, 2008) or a change in the diet (Goss‐Custard et al., 2006; O'Connor & Brown, 1977; Zwarts & Wanink, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pese a la falta de información, aparentemente las áreas del brazo norte presentan un sedimento más compacto, producto de la menor profundidad y de los largos periodos de desecación, factor que afecta la penetrabilidad del pico de las aves y aumentan el gasto energético para conseguir alimento (Evans 1976, Mouritsen & Jensen 1992. Adicionalmente se ha observado que en estas zonas hay un predominio de sedimentos arenosos (Álvarez et al 2002), el cual es un hábitat físicamente riguroso, lo que puede estar ocasionando poca abundancia de invertebrados y presas disponibles (Barnes 1997) y una zona de salitrales amplia, donde aparentemente las salinidades altas impiden el asentamiento de comunidades bentónicas diversas (Verschuren et al 2000), como las existentes en el brazo sur.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified