1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002570050108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy barrier distributions in magnetic systems from the Tln(t/τ0) scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, as previously noted in Ref. 21, S is a magnitude proportional to the energy barrier distribution and therefore it has a direct physical meaning.…”
Section: Magnetic Viscosity and Energy Barrier Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, as previously noted in Ref. 21, S is a magnitude proportional to the energy barrier distribution and therefore it has a direct physical meaning.…”
Section: Magnetic Viscosity and Energy Barrier Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In both cases, and at each temperature, there is a time range, for which overlapping of the magnetization curves into a unique master curve is observed. 14,23,24,28 Below the inflection point of the relaxation curves, this overlapping involves the upper curves, while above the inflection point, the overlap occurs for the lower curves, as is the case in noninteracting systems ͑see Figs. 2, 3, and 4 of Ref.…”
Section: B T Ln(t/ 0 ) Scaling and Effective Distribution Of Energy mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the first one, based on the so-called barrier plot and proposed by Barbara and Gunther, 22 the volume and field dependence of the energy barrier distribution can be obtained. The second approximation has been first proposed by Omari et al 23 to study spin glasses and more recently has been used by Iglesias et al 24 to study small particle systems. This approximation has been revealed to be a useful method to obtain the energy barrier distribution from the scaled magnetization curves as a function of the T ln͑t/ 0 ͒ scaling variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was successful in determination of magnetic unit sizes in different systems, from magnetic nanoparticles [14,15,16], to magnetic clusters in amorphous ribbon [17] and magnetic nano-regions in multiferroics. [18] Therefore, we believe this model is valid in case of presented amorphous nanoparticles.…”
Section: Magnetic Anisotropy and Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter S tells how many particles relax, while measuring at a specific temperature. [15] Therefore, after transforming the temperature domain of S(T) to diameter domain in S(D) using the same procedure as above, the distribution of particles over diameter is obtained and also shown in figure 6.…”
Section: Magnetic Anisotropy and Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%