1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(96)00151-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-based approach to impact damage in CFRP laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where impact denotes the incident impact energy, rebound the kinetic energy of the rebounding impactor, damage the energy consumed by generation of damage and dissipated the energy dissipated as vibration, heat, inelastic deformation of the impactor or the fixture and so on (Delfosse and Poursartip, 1997). In the low-velocity impact without full penetration, dissipated is relatively larger than damage due to global deformation while damage is dominant in the high-velocity impact because of local deformation .…”
Section: Discussion 41 Comparison Of Damage Between Low-and High-velmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where impact denotes the incident impact energy, rebound the kinetic energy of the rebounding impactor, damage the energy consumed by generation of damage and dissipated the energy dissipated as vibration, heat, inelastic deformation of the impactor or the fixture and so on (Delfosse and Poursartip, 1997). In the low-velocity impact without full penetration, dissipated is relatively larger than damage due to global deformation while damage is dominant in the high-velocity impact because of local deformation .…”
Section: Discussion 41 Comparison Of Damage Between Low-and High-velmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation is that C-scan typically only measurers the projected delamination area however the energy absorbed can go to local deformation, matrix cracking, delaminations and fibre fracture [34]. This can be further complicated by the energy release rate [35] where more energy is required to propagate delamination and the distribution of the delaminations in the through-thickness.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is reported that under low-velocity impact the mass of impactor played an important role in material's dynamic response, which can explicitly be solved using quasi-static method when the ratio of impactor/object mass is larger than 2 with longer impact duration, while the response is dominated by flexural waves when the impactor/object mass ratio is less than 1/5 with shorter impact duration [4]. The energy absorption mechanisms of fiber composites may be contributed by the matrix cracking, fiber breakage, delamination, and ply splitting under low-velocity large mass impact [3,[5][6][7][8][9]. Generally, the size and severity of the damage are gradually getting larger as the exterior input impact energy increased while under the low-velocity drop-weight impact [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%