2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajce.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy changes during use of high-power ultrasound on food grade surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of the the P N caused a significant linear increase in the heating rate, and consequently in the I (p value <0.05). This linear dependence was previously reported for different systems and for different solvents , distilled water (Mamvura et al, 2018), municipal wastewater with suspended particles (Gibson et al, 2009) or peanut shell suspensions . Increasing the nominal applied energy enhanced the heating rate in the suspensions.…”
Section: Acoustic Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase of the the P N caused a significant linear increase in the heating rate, and consequently in the I (p value <0.05). This linear dependence was previously reported for different systems and for different solvents , distilled water (Mamvura et al, 2018), municipal wastewater with suspended particles (Gibson et al, 2009) or peanut shell suspensions . Increasing the nominal applied energy enhanced the heating rate in the suspensions.…”
Section: Acoustic Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…decreased in a constant way from 1.5 cm up to 5.5 cm away from the sonotrode because the maximum acoustic intensity decreased exponentially when too little distances close to the tip are taken Mamvura et al (2018). and Son et al(2009) alsoreported similar linear trend when applying electrical power above 100 W in distilled water over higher distances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This occurs due to energy loss in the equipment by dissipation during the subsequent conversions of mechanical energy into cavitation. According to Mamvura, Iyuke and Paterson [57], an energy conversion from electrical to cavitation of 9% was achieved. Shirsath, Sable, Gaikwad, Sonawane, Saini and Gogate [36] also verified through a calorimetric method that the energy efficiency of the process was approximately 5.6%.…”
Section: Specific Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible reasons for this attenuation are related to the reflection, refraction, diffraction or scattering of the wave when travelling across the suspensions. Moreover viscous interactions of the particles can also contribute to the degradation of the acoustic energy into heat (Mamvura et al, 2018; (Table 5.4.1).…”
Section: Influence Of Nominal Electrical Power Applied (P N ) On Acoumentioning
confidence: 99%