Energy Democracy and the City: Evaluating the Practice and Potential of Municipal Sustainability Planning

Abstract

While calls for, and work toward, energy democracy have been entrenched in social movements, and the concept has a burgeoning posture in academic discourse, perhaps the most significant implication for its development is the potential for its implementation at the local governance scale. In order for municipal efforts to be wholly democratic, energy policy must be accessible and responsive to the needs of all communities. This necessitates the convergence of an energy democracy paradigm with principles and practices of both energy justice and just sustainabilities that encourage communities and households' entrée to the energy planning arena, as participants in policy making and with access to renewable innovations. By using a case study as its means of analysis, this paper will evaluate municipal-scale energy programming by considering the prospects of energy democracy on a sub-state scale. In our analysis of Washington, DC's sustainable energy utility, we highlight challenges that limit the potential for energy democracy in the nation's capital, along with practices that lead DC toward energy justice and democracy. We conclude by offering indicators for democratized urban energy planning.

The Rise and Fall of Energy Democracy: 5 Cases of Collaborative Governance in Energy Systems

“…Becker and Naumann (2017) furthermore identify essential elements important in different struggles: decentralization of energy systems, engagement of citizens in the decision-making process, collective (public and cooperative) forms of ownership, substantial economic benefits associated with energy activity, and self-determination and alternatives to extractivist development. Others characterize ED by its objectives, such as correcting structural inequalities linked to energy policies (Hess 2018), and resolving situations of energy insecurity and accessibility for the most marginalized populations (Teron and Ekoh 2018).…”

Affordable and Accessible Solar for All: Barriers, Solutions, and On-Site Adoption Potential

“…7 Also, because these communities have been targeted for scams and exploitation, they can be distrustful of promises of energy savings, making consumer protection measures even more important. Language barriers and lack of internet access can compound the issue by increasing the lack of access to information; more than 25 million Americans have a first language other than English, and lack of accessibility for limited English-proficient communities has also been linked as an impediment to environmental participation and decision making (Teron and Ekoh 2018). About 44% of households with incomes below $30,000 a year do not have access to home broadband services (Perrin 2018).…”

“La justicia ambiental es para ti y para mí”: Translating Collective Struggles for Environmental and Energy Justice in Puerto Rico’s Jobos Bay Communities

“…These researchers explain that conceptualizing energy transitions as only about technology challenges seriously overlooks the many power inequities shaping these controversies and possibilities (Castro-Sitiriche, 2019;Fortier et al, 2019;O'Neill-Carrillo et al, 2017;O'Neill-Carrillo et al, 2019). Energy studies must account adequately for how privilege and precarity impact the lived experiences of individuals, families, and communities struggling for sustainable jobs, clean air and water, and the protection of places and people about which they care (Teron and Ekoh, 2018). This critical attention evinces the importance of situated, place-based analyses of energy in/justice in practice, including in non-continental spaces, to consider and contribute to "archipelagic rhetoric" (Na'puti, 2019).…”