Nuclear Methods in Mineralogy and Geology 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5363-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been remarked in previous annual reviews, XRF has become one of the standard techniques used for the routine analysis of geological samples, a theme continued by Potts, 360,361 who showed that XRF and ICP-MS was the combination of techniques most widely adopted for routine geochemical analysis, although arguing that microprobe techniques were most likely to have a more signi®cant impact on advances in geochemistry in future years. The role and capabilities of EDXRF were reviewed by Bacso et al 362 The widespread use of WDXRF in the routine analysis of rocks is not, as might be expected, illustrated by a large number of reports published within the reviewing period, since the method is now well established and few innovations are possible using normal laboratory instrumentation. However, Borkhodoev 363 reported on the XRF determination of Nb, Rb, Sr, Y and Zr in rocks to 2±3 mg g 21 detection limits.…”
Section: Geologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been remarked in previous annual reviews, XRF has become one of the standard techniques used for the routine analysis of geological samples, a theme continued by Potts, 360,361 who showed that XRF and ICP-MS was the combination of techniques most widely adopted for routine geochemical analysis, although arguing that microprobe techniques were most likely to have a more signi®cant impact on advances in geochemistry in future years. The role and capabilities of EDXRF were reviewed by Bacso et al 362 The widespread use of WDXRF in the routine analysis of rocks is not, as might be expected, illustrated by a large number of reports published within the reviewing period, since the method is now well established and few innovations are possible using normal laboratory instrumentation. However, Borkhodoev 363 reported on the XRF determination of Nb, Rb, Sr, Y and Zr in rocks to 2±3 mg g 21 detection limits.…”
Section: Geologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%