2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.02.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy dissipation and macro instabilities in a stirred square tank investigated using an LE PIV approach and LDA measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large eddy approach depends on the large velocity gradients in the vicinity of the impeller, which rapidly decrease in the main flow direction, whereas dimensional analysis produced a more even distribution of  along the discharge stream. The comparison between the LES result and dimensional analysis is in agreement with the findings of Kilander and Rasmuson (2005), who obtained a five-times greater mean dissipation rate from the LES analogy, and also noted a significant difference in distribution between the two methods.…”
Section: Dissipation Ratesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large eddy approach depends on the large velocity gradients in the vicinity of the impeller, which rapidly decrease in the main flow direction, whereas dimensional analysis produced a more even distribution of  along the discharge stream. The comparison between the LES result and dimensional analysis is in agreement with the findings of Kilander and Rasmuson (2005), who obtained a five-times greater mean dissipation rate from the LES analogy, and also noted a significant difference in distribution between the two methods.…”
Section: Dissipation Ratesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The calculation of  has been the subject of many previous works (e.g. Kresta and Wood, 1993;Wu and Patterson, 1989;Zhou and Kresta, 1996;Baldi and Yianneskis, 2003;Ducci and Yianneskis, 2005;Sharp and Adrian, 2001;Khan, 2005, Kilander andRasmuson, 2005;Sheng et al, 2000); a comparison between the different methods has not been provided in this paper (but may be found in the work of Unadkat (2010)). It is now well known that the LES analogy provides the best approximation (Khan, 2005;Gabriele et al, 2009), and hence this method has been employed here to estimate the dissipation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stirrer speed, the tip speed, the Reynolds number and the average velocity gradient for the different configurations are shown in Table 2. The power consumption per volume used in the higher energy input was the same as the one used in the dissipation study by Kilander and Rasmuson (2005).…”
Section: Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This similar approach called Large eddy PIV was used for dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy in an agitated vessel e.g. by [5,14,8,10,11]. The basic presumption should be fulfilled: grid size has to be in inertial sub-range, where turbulent kinetic energy is transferred from large scales to small ones.…”
Section: Large Eddy Piv Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], but the results of absolute values of local dissipation rates have not been accomplished yet. While formerly a temporal record of instantaneous velocities [3,12] or two point measurement [9] was used for determination of dissipation rate, nowadays determination from velocity field obtained by PIV method [5,6,8,10,11] is preferred. This trend will be probably continued according to measurement techniques development to fully 3D measurements with resolution up to Kolmogorov scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%