Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1791314.1791347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-efficient cluster computing with FAWN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FAWN was a proposal to use Intel Atom processors in clusters [38]. The cluster was built and tested with a range of workloads, but evaluation did not include a suite of true HPC workloads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAWN was a proposal to use Intel Atom processors in clusters [38]. The cluster was built and tested with a range of workloads, but evaluation did not include a suite of true HPC workloads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SATA-based Flash SSDs have been capable of up to 100,000 small (512-byte) random reads per second since 2009 [31], and enterprise-level PCIe-based SSDs claim 1.2 million random I/Os per second [11]. Prototype PCIe NVM platforms achieve similar throughput with latencies of 40 microseconds for phase-change memory [3] and 10 microseconds for NVM emulators [6].…”
Section: The Shrinking Cpu-i/o Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAWN-KV was designed for a hardware architecture combining flash devices from a prior generation of CompactFlash or SATA-based SSDs with lowpower processors such as the Intel Atom. The software has therefore already been optimized to minimize memory consumption and CPU overhead to take advantage of SSDs capable of 80,000+ IOPS [31].…”
Section: The Shrinking Cpu-i/o Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gordon [1]. A version using the Intel Atom was evaluated across a wide range of workloads [21]. This evaluation showed FAWN breaking the energy-efficient sorting record set by Beckmann in 2010 with similar hardware [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on platforms for sequential I/Ointensive workloads used Atom-based systems on the assumption that the I/O would be the bottleneck and the CPU would thus not be heavily utilized [4,19,21]. However, the SSDs in these systems mitigate this bottleneck for Sort, placing more stress on the CPU.…”
Section: Multi-machine Dryad Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%